Assessment of fetal liver volume and umbilical venous volume flow in pregnancies complicated by insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

To determine fetal liver volume and its relation with umbilical venous volume flow and maternal glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus type I. A cross sectional matched control study. Obstetric out patient clinic, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre, Rotter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Vol. 110; no. 11; pp. 1007 - 1013
Main Authors BOITO, Simona M, STRUIJK, Piet C, URSEM, Nicolette T. C, STIJNEN, Theo, WLADIMIROFF, Juriy W
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell 01.11.2003
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To determine fetal liver volume and its relation with umbilical venous volume flow and maternal glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus type I. A cross sectional matched control study. Obstetric out patient clinic, Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre, Rotterdam. Data from fetuses of diabetic women (n = 32; 18-36 weeks) were compared with data from normal controls (n = 32) matched for gestational age. Umbilical venous cross sectional area (mm(2)) and time-averaged velocity (mm/s Doppler) were determined for calculation of volume flow (mL/min) and flow per kilogram fetal weight (mL/min/kg). Umbilical artery pulsatility index was determined. Fetal liver volume measurements were obtained using a Voluson 530-D. Fetal liver volume, umbilical venous volume flow and downstream impedance. A statistically significant difference between fetuses of diabetic women and normal controls was found for liver volume (mean [SD]: 45.9 [34.0] vs 38.3 [28.7] mL), abdominal circumference (22.2 [6.6] vs 21.3 [5.6] cm), estimated fetal weight (1162 [898] vs 1049 [765] g) and fetoplacental weight ratio (0.22 vs 0.19) and liver volume/estimated fetal weight ratio (4.13% [0.007] vs 3.62% [0.009]). Umbilical venous volume flow (mL/min) and umbilical artery pulsatility index were not essentially different between the two study groups, but umbilical venous volume flow per kilogram fetal weight was lower (P < 0.05) in the diabetes group (94.3 [26.1] mL/min kg) compared with normal controls (109.5 [28.0] mL/min/kg). A positive correlation existed between fetal liver volume and maternal HbA1c (P = 0.002). Measurement of fetal liver volume by three-dimensional ultrasound may play a role in identifying fetal growth acceleration in diabetic pregnancies. Fetal liver volume increase is positively related to maternal HbA1c levels reflecting degree of maternal glycemic control. Fetal liver volume normalised for estimated fetal weight is significantly higher in the fetuses of diabetic women. In the present study, umbilical venous volume flow and fetoplacental downstream impedance are not different between diabetic and normal pregnancies.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1470-0328
1471-0528
DOI:10.1016/S1470-0328(03)02533-3