Thinking Big About Big Data

• Published in: Industrial and organizational psychology Vol. 8; no. 4; pp. 545 - 550
• Main Authors: Wax, Amy, Asencio, Raquel, Carter, Dorothy R.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.12.2015
• Subjects: 21st century; Big Data; Commentaries; Creativity; Data analysis; Interdisciplinary aspects; Psychologists; Research methodology; Researchers; Scientists; Startups; Teams
• ISSN: 1754-9426; 1754-9434
• DOI: 10.1017/iop.2015.81

Guzzo, Fink, King, Tonidandel, and Landis (2015) review important issues—privacy, informed consent, and data/data analysis integrity—that are critical logistical considerations in any program of research with human subjects, including studies utilizing big data. Overall, we agree with the cautionary sentiment conveyed throughout the focal article; industrial and organizational (I-O) psychology researchers and practitioners should not assume that big data is a panacea, and many of our established disciplinary approaches for ensuring ethical and accurate research are applicable—or modifiable—in big data contexts. However, we believe that the conversation about big data in I-O psychology is broader than that reviewed by Guzzo et al., and we would like to further elaborate on the focal article. We present this commentary from our perspective as junior scholars entering the field at a critical time—a time when I-O psychology is becoming increasingly intertwined with big data science.