Nonstomatal limitations are responsible for drought-induced photosynthetic inhibition in four C 4 grasses

•   Here, the contribution of stomatal and nonstomatal factors to photosynthetic inhibition under water stress in four tropical C grasses was investigated (Panicum coloratum, Bothriochloa bladhii, Cenchrus ciliaris and Astrebla lappacea). •   Plants were grown in well watered soil, and then the effe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe New phytologist Vol. 159; no. 3; pp. 599 - 608
Main Authors Ghannoum, Oula, Conroy, Jann P, Driscoll, Simon P, Paul, Matthew J, Foyer, Christine H, Lawlor, David W
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 01.09.2003
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:•   Here, the contribution of stomatal and nonstomatal factors to photosynthetic inhibition under water stress in four tropical C grasses was investigated (Panicum coloratum, Bothriochloa bladhii, Cenchrus ciliaris and Astrebla lappacea). •   Plants were grown in well watered soil, and then the effects of soil drying were measured on leaf gas exchange, chlorophyll a fluorescence and water relations. •   During the drying cycle, leaf water potential (Ψ ) and relative water content (RWC) decreased from c. -0.4 to -2.8 MPa and 100-40%, respectively. The CO assimilation rates (A) and quantum yield of PSII (Φ ) of all four grasses decreased rapidly with declining RWC. High CO concentration (2500 µl l ) had no effect on A or Φ at any stage of the drying cycle. Electron transport capacity and dark respiration rates were unaltered by drought. The CO compensation concentrations of P. coloratum and C. ciliaris rose sharply when leaf RWC fell below 70%. In P. coloratum, 5% CO did not prevent the decline of O evolution rates under water stress. •   We conclude that inhibition of photosynthesis in the four C grasses under water stress is dependent mainly on biochemical limitations.
ISSN:0028-646X
1469-8137
DOI:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00835.x