Comparison of restructured chops manufactured from prerigor and postrigor pork

Restructured chops from prerigor (P) and conventionally boned (C) pork were unsalted (U) or salted (S) with 2.0% sodium chloride (NaCl) and 0.25% sodium tripolyphosphate (STP). After storage for 5, 14 and 42 d, samples were subjectively evaluated for amount of discoloration, consumer desirability, j...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of food protection Vol. 46; no. 7; pp. 589 - 591
Main Authors Marriott, N.G, Graham, P.P, Bovard, K.P
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 01.07.1983
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Restructured chops from prerigor (P) and conventionally boned (C) pork were unsalted (U) or salted (S) with 2.0% sodium chloride (NaCl) and 0.25% sodium tripolyphosphate (STP). After storage for 5, 14 and 42 d, samples were subjectively evaluated for amount of discoloration, consumer desirability, juiciness, tenderness and flavor. Objective measurements included Hunter color difference meter readings and TBA values. Generally, objective and subjective appearance traits and flavor deteriorated (P<0.05) with increased storage time. No consistent differences (P>0.05) in subjective and objective appearance traits and flavor were found between P and C samples. Objective and subjective evaluations revealed that salted P and C chops were generally inferior (P<0.05) in appearance but not different (P>0.05) from unsalted P and C samples in flavor. No differences (P>0.05) in tenderness and juiciness existed between P and C samples, whereas salted (P and C) chops were generally more (P<0.05) tender and juicy than unsalted counterparts. Samples with higher juiciness scores usually had superior tenderness scores. No consistent differences (P>0.05) were found between chops manufactured from prerigor pork and conventionally boned counterparts.
Bibliography:8281288
Q10
S10
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0362-028X
1944-9097
DOI:10.4315/0362-028X-46.7.589