Distance to CAR-T Treatment Center Does Not Impede Delivery

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in relapsed or refractory large B cell lymphoma, but real-world evidence is needed to confirm safety and efficacy when facing the unique challenges of a wide geographical catchment area. We reviewed patients treate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of haematology
Main Authors Tan, Xiu Xia Sherry, Maltez, Melissa T, Mallick, Ranjeeta, Hamelin, Linda, McDiarmid, Sheryl, Cieniak, Carolina, Granger, Matthew, Bredeson, Christopher, Kennah, Michael, Atkins, Harold L, Kekre, Natasha
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 24.10.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in relapsed or refractory large B cell lymphoma, but real-world evidence is needed to confirm safety and efficacy when facing the unique challenges of a wide geographical catchment area. We reviewed patients treated with commercially available CAR-T at a medium-sized single center in Canada (The Ottawa Hospital) between December 2020 and July 2022 (Canadian implementation started in 2020). Fifty-one patients (59% male, median age 62) traveled a median distance of 655 km (range 3-3659) for treatment. Median time from apheresis to CAR-T infusion was 36 days (range 26-81). With a median follow-up of 383 days (95% CI: 333-480), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 257 days (95% CI: 92-NE) and 422 days (95% CI: 106-NE), respectively. The median PFS for out-of-province patients was 115 days (95% CI: 91-NE) versus 280 days for in-province patients (95% CI: 142-NE), p = 0.12. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that distance from treatment center (p = 0.05) and refractory disease status (p = 0.003) were independently associated with shorter PFS. The time from the last disease progression to CAR-T referral was longer for out-of-province patients, but there was no difference in the time of referral to CAR-T consult, apheresis, or CAR-T infusion between in-province and out-of-province patients. Our results confirm that despite the complexity of CAR-T therapy administration, Ottawa can effectively provide commercial CAR-T therapy in a timely fashion for patients from across the country.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0902-4441
1600-0609
1600-0609
DOI:10.1111/ejh.14331