Randomized control trial comparing genetic counseling service delivery models in an underserved population

• Published in: Journal of genetic counseling
• Main Authors: Lahiri, Sayoni, Mersch, Jacqueline, Zimmerman, John, Mauer Hall, Caitlin, Moriarty, Kelsey, Gemmell, Amber, Lee, MinJae, Clark, Cheyla, Luong, Michelle, Stokes, Caroline, Romano, Kathryn, James, Cynthia A, Pirzadeh-Miller, Sara
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States 07.10.2024
• Subjects: disparities; genetic counseling; underrepresented populations; outcomes; genetics services; service delivery models
• ISSN: 1059-7700; 1573-3599; 1573-3599
• DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1975

This randomized controlled trial compares outcomes of telephone versus in-person genetic counseling service models in underserved, bilingual patient populations referred for cancer genetic counseling. Between 2022 and 2023, a two-arm (telephone vs. in-person genetic counseling) prospective, randomized controlled study with 201 participants was conducted at two county hospital cancer genetics clinics. Primary outcomes included comparison of pre- and post-genetic counseling genetics knowledge (Multi-dimensional Model of Informed Choice, MMIC), genetic counseling visit satisfaction (Genetic Counseling Satisfaction Scale, GCSS), and genetic counseling visit completion rates. Secondary outcomes included comparison of genetic testing attitudes and informed choice (MMIC), genetic counseling-specific empowerment (Genomic Outcomes Scale, GOS), and genetic testing completion and cancellation/failure rates, using linear regression models (significance ≤0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between arms in pre/post-genetic counseling MMIC knowledge and attitude, GOS or GCSS scores or genetic counseling completion. While more participants in the telephone versus in-person arm made an informed choice about testing (52.5% v. 39.0%, p = 0.0552), test completion was lower (74% v. 100%, p < 0.05) for this group. Genetic counseling completion rates and MMIC knowledge and attitude, GOS, and GCSS scores suggest telephone genetic counseling is comparable to in-person genetic counseling for underserved populations. Higher informed choice scores and significantly lower testing completion rates for telephone visits require further study.