Comparison of Two Different Underfloor Ventilation Systems Using CFD

Concepts of remedial treatments of historic buildings using ventilated floors, with a few exceptions, are with considerable popularity preferred by the representatives of monument protection. The fact that they require small interventions in the masonry is of great benefit for compliance with the me...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 330; pp. 916 - 920
Main Authors Rencko, Tomas, Sedlakova, Anna
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Zurich Trans Tech Publications Ltd 27.06.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Concepts of remedial treatments of historic buildings using ventilated floors, with a few exceptions, are with considerable popularity preferred by the representatives of monument protection. The fact that they require small interventions in the masonry is of great benefit for compliance with the methodology of cultural heritage protection, as is the fact that such interventions do not compromise the structural analysis of buildings. These concepts have gained great popularity also because they can be considered kind of a "return" to historical example. With these technologies we return to the methods and principles that the ancient Egyptians were already familiar with. The paradox is that these methods are used for many centuries, until today they are only proposed on the basis of empiricism. In this article two different underfloor ventilation systems are compared using CFD simulation.
Bibliography:Selected, peer reviewed papers from the 2nd International Conference on Materials Engineering and Automatic Control (ICMEAC 2013), May 18-19, 2013, Shandong, China
ISBN:9783037857250
3037857250
ISSN:1660-9336
1662-7482
1662-7482
DOI:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.330.916