An RGD to LDV Motif Conversion within the Disintegrin Kistrin Generates an Integrin Antagonist That Retains Potency but Exhibits Altered Receptor Specificity

• Published in: The Journal of biological chemistry Vol. 272; no. 34; pp. 21341 - 21348
• Main Authors: Tselepis, Vicky H., Green, Linda J., Humphries, Martin J.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Inc 22.08.1997; American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
• ISSN: 0021-9258; 1083-351X
• DOI: 10.1074/jbc.272.34.21341

Integrin ligands almost invariably employ a variant of either the RGD or LDV motif as a key element of their receptor recognition site. These short acidic peptide sequences collaborate with specific nonhomologous flanking residues and spatially separate “synergy” sequences to determine receptor binding specificity. Although the consensus sequences for RGD and LDV motifs are quite different, their common use suggests that they might share a critical role in receptor-ligand engagement. To date, the effects of interconversion of the two motifs within a natural protein framework have not been tested; however, in this study, we have converted the natural RGD site found in the snake venom disintegrin kistrin into an LDV motif and examined the effects of the change on the specificity of integrin recognition and on disintegrin potency. While an assessment of receptor binding using cell adhesion and purified integrin solid-phase assays demonstrated recognition of recombinant RGD kistrin by αVβ3 and α5β1, a series of LDV kistrin chimeras did not bind to these integrins, but instead were recognized specifically by α4β1. The minimal change to elicit this distinct switch in receptor specificity was found to involve alteration of only three residues within kistrin. Alanine scanning mutagenesis was used to provide further information on the functional contribution of the three residues. More important, the LDV kistrin chimeras also retained much of the characteristic potency of RGD kistrin, indicating that the kistrin scaffold is optimized for presentation of both RGD and LDV sequences. These findings provide evidence for similarities in motif pharmacophore and reinforce the hypothesis that RGD and LDV sites have an equivalent functional role in receptor binding. They also demonstrate the potential for other disintegrin-containing proteins, perhaps from the ADAM family, to employ LDV sequences for integrin binding.