Upward-closed hereditary families in the dominance order

The majorization relation orders the degree sequences of simple graphs into posets called dominance orders. As shown by Ruch and Gutman (1979) and Merris (2002), the degree sequences of threshold and split graphs form upward-closed sets within the dominance orders they belong to, i.e., any degree se...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDiscrete mathematics and theoretical computer science Vol. 23, no. 3; no. Graph Theory
Main Authors Barrus, Michael D., Guillaume, Jean A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Discrete Mathematics & Theoretical Computer Science 2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The majorization relation orders the degree sequences of simple graphs into posets called dominance orders. As shown by Ruch and Gutman (1979) and Merris (2002), the degree sequences of threshold and split graphs form upward-closed sets within the dominance orders they belong to, i.e., any degree sequence majorizing a split or threshold sequence must itself be split or threshold, respectively. Motivated by the fact that threshold graphs and split graphs have characterizations in terms of forbidden induced subgraphs, we define a class $\mathcal{F}$ of graphs to be dominance monotone if whenever no realization of $e$ contains an element $\mathcal{F}$ as an induced subgraph, and $d$ majorizes $e$, then no realization of $d$ induces an element of $\mathcal{F}$. We present conditions necessary for a set of graphs to be dominance monotone, and we identify the dominance monotone sets of order at most 3.
ISSN:1365-8050
1365-8050
DOI:10.46298/dmtcs.5666