Re-evaluation of the prism adaptation test for the examination of retinal correspondence

In order to test anomalous retinal correspondence objectively, a prism adaptation test was performed on 17 esotropic patients by both the overcorrection method and neutralizing method. The overcorrection method is a method which causes exodeviation by the use of overcorrected base-out prism and alte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJAPANESE ORTHOPTIC JOURNAL Vol. 17; pp. 171 - 177
Main Authors WAKAYAMA, Akemi, IKEBUCHI, Junko, MIYAI, Emiko, MATSUMOTO, Fumiko, NAKAMURA, Hitomi, MATSUMOTO, Hisayo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published JAPANESE ASSOCIATION OF CERTIFIED ORTHOPTISTS 1989
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In order to test anomalous retinal correspondence objectively, a prism adaptation test was performed on 17 esotropic patients by both the overcorrection method and neutralizing method. The overcorrection method is a method which causes exodeviation by the use of overcorrected base-out prism and alternate prism cover test (APCT) and the neutralizing method is a method which causes no deviation by the use of the appropriate prism and the APCT. The prism was placed in front of the strabismic eye for half an hour and the angle of residual esodeviation was measured by the APCT. Eight cases of esotropia were diagnosed as normal retinal correspondence and the remaining 9 cases were diagnosed as anomalous retinal correspondence. The angle of residual esodeviation of these 9 cases were almost equal to the angle measured by the use of synoptophore. It was discussed that the angle of residual esodeviation measured by the prism adaptation test might be related to the degree of anomalous retinal correspondence. It was suggested that the prism adaptation test might be useful for the objective assessment of retinal correspondence.
ISSN:0387-5172
1883-9215
DOI:10.4263/jorthoptic.17.171