31P nuclear magnetic resonance and zero-point titration compared for measuring free magnesium concentration in erythrocytes

Intracellular ionized magnesium concentrations ([Mg2+]i) were measured in erythrocytes by 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and zero-point titration in 14 controls and seven patients with renal magnesium loss. The mean intracellular ionized magnesium concentration in controls measured by 31P NMR...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inClinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.) Vol. 37; no. 12; pp. 2076 - 2080
Main Authors Geven, WB, Vogels-Mentink, GM, Willems, JL, von Os, CH, Hilbers, CW, Joordens, JJ, Rijksen, G, Monnens, LA
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Washington, DC Am Assoc Clin Chem 01.12.1991
American Association for Clinical Chemistry
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Intracellular ionized magnesium concentrations ([Mg2+]i) were measured in erythrocytes by 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and zero-point titration in 14 controls and seven patients with renal magnesium loss. The mean intracellular ionized magnesium concentration in controls measured by 31P NMR was 0.20 (SD 0.03) mmol/L cell water, compared with 0.55 (SD 0.12) mmol/L cell water by zero-point titration. Total erythrocyte magnesium content measured with the lysate method was 0.63 mmol/L cell water higher than estimated by 31P NMR, probably because not all magnesium complexes are fully visible to the NMR technique. We found a positive correlation between plasma ultrafiltrable magnesium and [Mg2+]i irrespective of the [Mg2+]i assay used. [Mg2+]i measured with 31P NMR correlated modestly but significantly with [Mg2+]i determined by zero-point titration (r = 0.58, P less than 0.02). Washing erythrocytes before the zero-point titration decreased the ATP content and the cell water fraction, which led to overestimation of [Mg2+]i by zero-point titration. Although absolute values for [Mg2+]i differ with the assay used, both methods determined significantly lower values for [Mg2+]i in patients with isolated renal magnesium loss.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0009-9147
1530-8561
DOI:10.1093/clinchem/37.12.2076