Use of a Low Profile Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Diaphyseal Humeral Cement Restrictor in Shoulder Arthroplasty

• Published in: Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty Vol. 8; p. 24715492241291328
• Main Authors: Bond, Elizabeth C, Finley, Suzanne, Pennington, Elizabeth, Reinke, Emily K, McGarvey, Lewis, Garrigues, Grant E, Lassiter, Tally E, Anakwenze, Oke A
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States SAGE Publishing 2024
• Subjects: cement; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Shoulder arthroplasty; cement restrictor; revision shoulder arthroplasty; cement mantle
• ISSN: 2471-5492; 2471-5492
• DOI: 10.1177/24715492241291328

When implanting a cemented humeral stem, a reliable method to prevent inappropriate extension and enable pressurization of cement in the intramedullary canal is required. The aim was to assess the outcomes of a dedicated humeral diaphyseal cement restrictor. In total 218 shoulders (207 patients) were included in the study, all of whom underwent a cemented total shoulder arthroplasty and a retrospective review was performed. The primary outcomes of interest were device stability in the medullary canal, successful occlusion of the canal, cement extrusion and quality of cement mantle. The majority of the cohort was female (63.3%) males and the average patient age was 71.7 years (SD 8.45). In 81.7% the device was deemed to be stable in the medullary canal. The device was significantly more stable in primary (84.2%) compared to revision cases (64.3%, p = 0.02). In 69.7% Barrack grade A mantle quality was achieved, this was higher in primary cases (74.2%) compared to revision cases (39.3%) (p = 0.00006). We noted excellent cementation outcomes using a cement restrictor specifically designed for the diaphyseal humerus anatomy. However, this humeral specific restrictor was noted to be more stable in primary as compared to revision cases.