Better Constant Scores and Active Forward Elevation Using Deltopectoral Versus Anterosuperior Approach for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Matched Cohort Study

• Published in: Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty Vol. 8; p. 24715492241234178
• Main Authors: Nerot, Cecile, Berhouet, Julien, Garret, Jérôme, Kany, Jean, ReSurg, SoFEC, Godenèche, Arnaud, van Rooij, Floris, Hibon, Aude, Nover, Luca, Saffarini, Mo, Aswad, Richard, Hubert, Laurent, Mansat, Pierre, Gallinet, David, Guery, Jacques, Josserand, Laurent Nove, Sirveaux, François, Peduzzi, Lisa
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States SAGE Publishing 2024
• Subjects: RSA; superolateral approach; constant score; anterolateral approach; range of motion; Reverse shoulder arthroplasty
• ISSN: 2471-5492; 2471-5492
• DOI: 10.1177/24715492241234178

To determine, from a sizable cohort of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), whether the deltopectoral (DP) or anterosuperior (AS) approach grant better outcomes at a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The authors reviewed 743 RSAs in patients with primary osteoarthritis (OA) with or without rotator cuff lesions and secondary OA due to rotator cuff tears. The DP approach was used in 540 and the AS approach in 203. Pre- and post-operative constant scores (CSs) and shoulder range of motion were recorded. Of the initial cohort of 743 shoulders, 193 (25.7%) were lost to follow-up, 16 (2.1%) died, and 33 (4.4%) were revised; 540 shoulders were operated using DP approach (73%), of which 22 were revised (4.1%), while 203 were operated using the AS approach (27%), of which 11 were revised (5.4%). Propensity score matching resulted in two groups: 172 shoulders operated by DP approach, and 88 shoulders operated by AS approach. Comparing outcomes of the matched groups at 2 or more years also revealed that, compared to the AS approach, the DP approach resulted in significantly better post-operative CSs (67.3 ± 14.0° vs 60.8 ± 18.3,  = 0.017), active forward elevation (137° ± 27.4° vs 129° ± 29.8;  = 0.031). At 2 or more years following RSA, the DP approach granted significantly better CS (by 6.5 points) and active forward elevation (by 8°) compared to the AS approach. The differences observed are clinically relevant and must be considered to manage patient expectations following RSA and for selecting surgical approach depending on their functional needs. III, comparative study.