Boredom That Wishes Not To Be
The present article deals with Heidegger’s research into boredom. The phenomenon cannot be simply described as an emotion but as a fundamental attunement, which represented a pathway to being qua being for Heidegger. Many scholars have argued that the philosopher’s treatment of the phenomenon led to...
Saved in:
Published in | Diametros Vol. 19; no. 72; pp. 26 - 43 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Krakow
Instytut Filozofii Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
01.06.2022
Institute of Philosophy, Jagiellonian University Jagiellonian University, Institute of Philosophy |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | The present article deals with Heidegger’s research into boredom. The phenomenon cannot be simply described as an emotion but as a fundamental attunement, which represented a pathway to being qua being for Heidegger. Many scholars have argued that the philosopher’s treatment of the phenomenon led to sublimation or transgression in describing it beyond its phenomenological limits. While I agree with the general assessment, I also believe that there is a need to expand the argument further. I will argue that the cause of such transgression lies mainly in Heidegger’s inability to separate the truth from the notion of meaning or sense. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1733-5566 1733-5566 |
DOI: | 10.33392/diam.1744 |