Evaluation of peri-implant crevicular fluid prostaglandin E 2 levels in augmented extraction sockets by different biomaterials

This study compares peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) prostaglandin E (PGE ) levels, clinical parameters and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values around implants placed in augmented extraction sockets. The sockets (24 in total) were randomly augmented using either EMD or Bio-Oss Collagen. Impl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inActa odontologica Scandinavica Vol. 74; no. 7; p. 532
Main Authors Alkan, Eylem Ayhan, Tüter, Gülay, Parlar, Ateş, Yücel, Ayşegül, Kurtiş, Bülent
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 02.10.2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study compares peri-implant crevicular fluid (PICF) prostaglandin E (PGE ) levels, clinical parameters and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values around implants placed in augmented extraction sockets. The sockets (24 in total) were randomly augmented using either EMD or Bio-Oss Collagen. Implant placements were performed after three months of healing. ISQ readings were evaluated at three points: at the time of surgery, at the first month and at the third month. PICF was collected for PGE evaluation after the first and the third months of implant surgery. After the first month, a higher level of PICF PGE was observed in the EMD group than in the Bio-Oss Collagen group, and this increase was of statistical significance; however, at the third month there was no statistically significant difference in PICF PGE levels between the two groups. For implants placed in EMD sites, ISQ values were statistically higher at the third month than at the first month, while no significant differences in ISQ value were detected between the first and third months in Bio-Oss Collagen sites. The results of this research suggest that both EMD and Bio-Oss Collagen are effective treatment modalities for stimulating the formation of new bone at extraction sites prior to implant surgery.
ISSN:1502-3850
DOI:10.1080/00016357.2016.1214979