Critical Synthesis Package: Duke University Religion Index (DUREL)

Abstract This Critical Synthesis Package contains: (1) a Critical Analysis of the psychometric properties and the application to health science education of the Duke University Religion Index (DUREL), and (2) a copy of the DUREL and the scoring instructions developed by Harold Koenig, MD. The DUREL...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMedEdPORTAL Vol. 9
Main Authors Young, Kathleen, Clark, Molly
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Association of American Medical Colleges 23.10.2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract This Critical Synthesis Package contains: (1) a Critical Analysis of the psychometric properties and the application to health science education of the Duke University Religion Index (DUREL), and (2) a copy of the DUREL and the scoring instructions developed by Harold Koenig, MD. The DUREL is a self-administered measure with five items divided into three subscales of Organizational Religious Activity (ORA), Non-Organizational Religious Activity (NORA), and Intrinsic Religiosity (IR). The response options are presented along 6-point (ORA, NORA) and 5-point (IR) Likert-type scales. The subscales are intended to be examined independently, with higher scores indicating greater ORA, NORA, and IR. The DUREL has been validated in clinical and community samples. Studies in medical education have found the DUREL scores to be related to medical student, resident, and educator beliefs about utilizing spirituality and religion in health care. However, studies of primary care residents have not found DUREL scores to be related to resident well-being. Furthermore, the DUREL was designed to assess religiosity in Western religions and may be less accurate assessing religiosity in Eastern religions, and despite its translation numerous languages, it does not appear that the DUREL has been utilized with Eastern religion samples. Although the DUREL may be useful as a broad measure of religiosity, other measures are recommended for more in-depth assessment of religiosity and spirituality.
ISSN:2374-8265
2374-8265
DOI:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9586