Quantitative trait loci for lodging resistance in a segregating wheat×spelt population

Lodging can strongly affect both the grain yield and the quality of wheat. Lodging represents a quantitative trait and is difficult to assess on a phenotypic basis. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) could therefore become an important tool in breeding for lodging resistance. In this study, we mapped a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTheoretical and applied genetics Vol. 98; no. 6-7; pp. 1171 - 1182
Main Authors KELLER, M, KARUTZ, C, SCHMID, J. E, STAMP, P, WINZELER, M, KELLER, B, MESSMER, M. M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Heidelberg Springer 01.05.1999
Berlin Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Lodging can strongly affect both the grain yield and the quality of wheat. Lodging represents a quantitative trait and is difficult to assess on a phenotypic basis. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) could therefore become an important tool in breeding for lodging resistance. In this study, we mapped and characterised quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for lodging resistance, as well as morphological traits correlated with lodging, in a segregating population of 226 recombinant inbred lines derived from the cross of the lodging-resistant wheat variety Forno with the susceptible spelt variety Oberkulmer. Lodging, plant height, leaf width, leaf-growth habit, culm stiffness, culm swinging, culm thickness, days to ear emergence and days to flowering were assessed in field trials at two locations in 1996 and at one location in 1997. Additionally, at one location weight and length parameters were also assessed. Plant height and culm stiffness explained 77% of the phenotypic variance of lodging in a multiple regression model over all three environments. QTL analysis of lodging and morphological parameters was based on a genetic map containing 230 loci with 23 linkage groups (2469cM). With the method of composite interval mapping nine QTLs for lodging resistance were detected, explaining 63% of the phenotypic variance in a simultaneous fit. Seven of these QTLs coincided with QTLs for morphological traits, reflecting the correlations between these traits and lodging. In our population the most efficient way to improve lodging resistance would be by a combination of indirect selection on plant height and culm stiffness together with MAS on the two QTLs for lodging resistance which did not coincide with QTLs for morphological traits.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:0040-5752
1432-2242
DOI:10.1007/s001220051182