Development of a Generating Method for Energy Saving Running Profile Considering Energy Consumption and Running Time on Next Section

There is growing demand for energy saving to prevent global warming. Thus, the railway industry is focusing on energy saving. Power consumption by running trains has a large variation of about 20% caused by drivers' operation. Therefore, improving the running profile will considerably reduce en...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIEEJ JOURNAL OF INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS Vol. 141; no. 3; p. 276
Main Authors Tsutsumi, Yuhi, Oda, Atsushi, Tsuji, Masaki, 堤 雄飛, 篤史, 小田, 辻 雅樹
Format Journal Article
LanguageJapanese
Published Tokyo Japan Science and Technology Agency 01.03.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There is growing demand for energy saving to prevent global warming. Thus, the railway industry is focusing on energy saving. Power consumption by running trains has a large variation of about 20% caused by drivers' operation. Therefore, improving the running profile will considerably reduce energy consumption. Some algorithms for generating energy saving running profile have been researched and developed. To extend the applicability of energy saving running profile to various railway, we have developed an algorithm for generating energy saving running profile which fulfills target passing time on line which has passing stations between departure and arrival station like limited express train, in addition to between only adjacent stations like local line. Conventional algorithms do not optimize the passing speed because it generates running profile without consideration after the passing station. As a result, there is inefficient acceleration on the next section, and the energy saving performance is degraded. To solve this issue, we propose an evaluation function that adds energy consumption and running time on the next section when generating an energy saving running profile. The proposed method was evaluated by a running simulation, and the results show that the energy saving is improved by at most 4.7%, compared with the conventional method.
ISSN:2187-1094
2187-1108
DOI:10.1541/ieejias.141.276