Experimental investigation and performance analysis of a spray-type ionic liquid desiccant dehumidifier

[Display omitted] •A spray-type dehumidifier using an ionic liquid desiccant was developed.•A theoretical model was established to analyze heat and mass transfer coefficients.•Spray-type dehumidifiers can reduce the required solution flow rate.•Spray-type dehumidifiers can save power consumption.•De...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied thermal engineering Vol. 254; p. 123891
Main Authors Liang, Jyun-De, Kao, Chia-Lin, Chen, Chih-Hao, Ho, Hong-Yi, Huang, Chih-Hsueh, Chen, Sih-Li
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.10.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[Display omitted] •A spray-type dehumidifier using an ionic liquid desiccant was developed.•A theoretical model was established to analyze heat and mass transfer coefficients.•Spray-type dehumidifiers can reduce the required solution flow rate.•Spray-type dehumidifiers can save power consumption.•Dehumidification effectiveness is comparable to halide salt solution dehumidifiers. Ionic liquid desiccants (ILDs) have vapor pressures similar to lithium chloride and no corrosion and crystallization problems, so they are considered a promising alternative to halide salt desiccant solutions. However, the cost of ILDs is more expensive than conventional halide salts, which limits their practical application. Thus, this study developed a spray-type dehumidifier using an ionic liquid desiccant to increase dehumidification performance and reduce the required amount of ILDs. The presented dehumidifier was tested at various operating conditions. Also, a theoretical model was established to analyze heat and mass transfer coefficients of the dehumidifier. Results indicate that the increase in the flow rate ratio of solution to air benefits absorption performance, and the mass flux of solution is suggested to exceed 170 mL s−1 to avoid the occurrence of air bypass. Moreover, compared with the packed bed type, the spray type can reduce the required solution flow rate by 35 % and save power consumption by 19 % under the same moisture removal rates. The dehumidification effectiveness of the presented dehumidifier was up to 0.64 and comparable to the conventional packed bed dehumidifier using lithium chloride solutions.
ISSN:1359-4311
DOI:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.123891