Authors' reply to “A note on architectures for large-capacity CAMs”

Recently, we presented a survey and analysis of large-capacity content addressable memories (CAMs). In his note, Parhami correctly points out that we omitted a reference to his seminal survey paper in this field; we regret this omission. Other contentions in his note are addressed in this reply. The...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIntegration (Amsterdam) Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 173 - 176
Main Authors Schultz, K.J., Gulak, P.G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 01.08.1997
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Recently, we presented a survey and analysis of large-capacity content addressable memories (CAMs). In his note, Parhami correctly points out that we omitted a reference to his seminal survey paper in this field; we regret this omission. Other contentions in his note are addressed in this reply. The motivation and structure of the original paper are reviewed to set the context. The parametric and graphical aspects of the paper, which we call the “taxonomy”, are indeed original, and reiterated as accurate. Our emphasis in the paper was, justifiably, on integrated circuit implementations and real physical issues relating to such implementations.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0167-9260
1872-7522
DOI:10.1016/S0167-9260(97)00011-4