Authors' reply to “A note on architectures for large-capacity CAMs”
Recently, we presented a survey and analysis of large-capacity content addressable memories (CAMs). In his note, Parhami correctly points out that we omitted a reference to his seminal survey paper in this field; we regret this omission. Other contentions in his note are addressed in this reply. The...
Saved in:
Published in | Integration (Amsterdam) Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 173 - 176 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier B.V
01.08.1997
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Recently, we presented a survey and analysis of large-capacity content addressable memories (CAMs). In his note, Parhami correctly points out that we omitted a reference to his seminal survey paper in this field; we regret this omission. Other contentions in his note are addressed in this reply. The motivation and structure of the original paper are reviewed to set the context. The parametric and graphical aspects of the paper, which we call the “taxonomy”, are indeed original, and reiterated as accurate. Our emphasis in the paper was, justifiably, on integrated circuit implementations and real physical issues relating to such implementations. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0167-9260 1872-7522 |
DOI: | 10.1016/S0167-9260(97)00011-4 |