Determination of more realistic Ke,r-factors for simplified elastic–plastic analysis

• Published in: Nuclear engineering and design Vol. 174; no. 3; pp. 343 - 352
• Main Authors: Bieniussa, Klaus W., Reck, Hans, Hübel, Hartwig
• Format: Journal Article Conference Proceeding
• Language: English
• Published: Amsterdam Elsevier B.V 05.10.1997; Elsevier
• Subjects: Applied sciences; Exact sciences and technology; Fracture mechanics (crack, fatigue, damage...); Fracture mechanics, fatigue and cracks; Fractures; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications); Mechanical engineering. Machine design; Mechanical properties and methods of testing. Rheology. Fracture mechanics. Tribology; Metals. Metallurgy; Physics; Solid mechanics; Steel design; Steel tanks and pressure vessels; boiler manufacturing; Structural and continuum mechanics; Fatigue; Fracture mechanics; Elastoplasticity; Pressure vessels
• ISSN: 0029-5493; 1872-759X
• DOI: 10.1016/S0029-5493(97)00129-5

According to the relevant KTA-Rules, e.g. KTA 3201.2 ( KTA, 1994), strain correction factors— K e-factors—have to be used in the fatigue analysis of pressurised components if the strain intensity ranges are determined by elastic analyses, and if in this case the range of primary plus secondary stress intensity exceeds a certain limit. This limit is three times the design stress intensity value, S m , and thus approximately corresponds to twice the value of the 0.2% strain limit. The relations given in the above-mentioned rules to determine the K e-factors for considering plastification have proved to be very conservative in many cases compared with the strain intensity ranges that were determined by complete elastic–plastic analyses. In order to improve the validity of the fatigue analysis, the topic of `Performance of fundamental work to prepare concrete proposals for realistic K e,r-factors (strain correction factors) to consider plastification at large strain amplitudes' was one of the subjects of the BMU project SR 2063. Work on this topic was jointly performed by GRS and Siemens. In summary, the result was that the proposed realistic K e,r-factors present a real alternative to the K e-factors of the regulations; the latter serve a mostly conservative registration of the observed elastic–plastic strain but cannot be explained in terms of physics and are not formulated in a manner adequately specific of any material. The exemplary verification calculations that have been performed so far show, furthermore, that the proposed realistic K e,r-factors can be easily determined and also deliver sufficiently conservative results. This new method therefore has great potential which, however, still has to continue to be verified by further calculations before it can be included in the KTA-Rules.