Contributions to the elucidation of a controversial episode.The Ciulei case. (1)
Considered in Romanian historiography as a representative miscarriage of justice, a proof of the imperfection of the military justice system during the First World War, the Ciulei case aroused the interest of post-war society because of the strident injustice that characterized the entire trial. To...
Saved in:
Published in | Bulletin of "Carol I" National Defense University Vol. 13; no. 3; pp. 27 - 53 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Bucharest
Carol I National Defence University Publishing House
01.01.2024
"Carol I" National Defence University |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Considered in Romanian historiography as a representative miscarriage of justice, a proof of the imperfection of the military justice system during the First World War, the Ciulei case aroused the interest of post-war society because of the strident injustice that characterized the entire trial. To make matters even more complicated, his brigade commander, Colonel Sturdza, who had signed the order to court-martial him, deserted to the enemy. What is actually the truth? Was Ciulei the victim of Sturdza or was he the victim of an unfortunate chain of events? With a title inspired by one of the few works that have approached this subject with scientific rigor, and here I am referring to the work of professors Petre Otu and Maria Georgescu, presented in the bibliography, this article aims to contribute to the elucidation of this episode, providing readers with arguments identified in primary sources, from documents in the custody of the Romanian National Military Archives. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 |
ISSN: | 2284-936X 2284-9378 |
DOI: | 10.53477/2284-9378-24-28 |