Simulator-based driving assessment after stroke: Interest as a complement to cognitive evaluation

Introduction Driving is a complex activity that requires motor, visuo-perceptual, behavioral and cognitive abilities, which all could be affected after stroke. There is no correlation between cognitive assessment and on-road test, which is the gold standard for driving assessment [1] . Few studies h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of physical and rehabilitation medicine Vol. 58; pp. e152 - e153
Main Authors Palayer, C, Froger, J., Dr, Bonnin Koang, H.Y., Dr, Proia, S, Laffont, I., Prof
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Masson SAS 01.09.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction Driving is a complex activity that requires motor, visuo-perceptual, behavioral and cognitive abilities, which all could be affected after stroke. There is no correlation between cognitive assessment and on-road test, which is the gold standard for driving assessment [1] . Few studies have so far been conducted on simulator-based assessment interest in the specific context of stroke [2]. Purpose The main aim of our study is to evaluate the contribution of driving simulator, in addition to cognitive assessment. Material and method It is a retrospective study, involving patients with supratentorial stroke, for global assessment before driving again, including: cognitive assessment (Trail Making Test, Rey-O complex figure, WAIS IV figure weights, Stroop test, BEC 96, the Bells Test), simulator-based assessment after commands adjustment (reaction time, driving control [speed, path], driving behavior) and medical assessment. Statistical analysis between cognitive assessment and driving simulator results are performed using a multiple linear regression model. Results Forty-three patients, admitted in our ward between 2010 and 2013 for driving assessment were included: 33 with ischemic stroke, 8 with hemorrhagic stroke (right hemisphere for 23 patients, left for 18). Statistical analysis is currently in progress. Discussion Driving simulator allows, compared to on-road test, a safe assessment with possible standardization procedures. Characterizing cognitive elements useful to predict inability to drive, in particular those giving a false sense of security and which should encourage to further exploration on simulator driving or on-road test, is important to optimize the management.
ISSN:1877-0657
1877-0665
DOI:10.1016/j.rehab.2015.07.363