Using an Assumed Lung Mass Inaccurately Estimates the Lung Absorbed Dose in Patients Undergoing Hepatic 90Yttrium Radioembolization Therapy

• Published in: Cardiovascular and interventional radiology Vol. 45; no. 12; pp. 1793 - 1800
• Main Authors: Dodson, Cassidy R., Marshall, Colin, Durieux, Jared C., Wojtylak, Patrick F., Davidson, Jon C., Muzic, Raymond F., Kardan, Arash
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York Springer US 01.12.2022; Springer Nature B.V
• Subjects: Cardiology; Clinical Investigation; Computed tomography; Customization; Dosimeters; Dosimetry; Estimates; Females; Imaging; Interventional Oncology; Lungs; Males; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Nuclear Medicine; Patients; Radiation; Radiation dosage; Radiology; Subgroups; Therapy; Ultrasound; Yttrium isotopes; Lung absorbed dose; Y radioembolization; Personalized dosimetry
• ISSN: 0174-1551; 1432-086X
• DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03197-w

Rationale Currently, the estimated absorbed radiation dose to the lung in 90 Y radioembolization therapy is calculated using an assumed 1 kg lung mass for all patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether using a patient-specific lung mass measurement for each patient rather than a generic, assumed 1 kg lung mass would change the estimated lung absorbed dose. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 68 patients who had undergone 90 Y radioembolization therapy at our institution. Individualized lung volumes were measured manually on CT scans for each patient, and these volumes were used to calculate personalized lung masses. The personalized lung masses were used to recalculate the estimated lung absorbed dose from the 90 Y therapy, and this dose was compared to the estimated lung absorbed dose calculated using an assumed 1 kg lung mass. Results Patient-specific lung masses were significantly different from the generic 1 kg when compared individually for each patient ( p  < 0.0001). Median individualized lung mass was 0.71 (IQR: 0.59, 1.02) kg overall and was significantly different from the generic 1 kg lung mass for female patients [0.59 (0.50, 0.68) kg, ( p  < 0.0001)] but not for male patients [0.99 (0.71, 1.14) kg, ( p  = 0.24)]. Median estimated lung absorbed dose was 4.48 (2.38, 11.71) Gy using a patient-specific lung mass and 3.45 (1.81, 6.68) Gy when assuming a 1 kg lung mass for all patients. The estimated lung absorbed dose was significantly different using a patient-specific versus generic 1 kg lung mass when comparing the doses individually for each patient ( p  < 0.0001). The difference in the estimated lung absorbed dose between the patient-specific and generic 1 kg lung mass method was significant for female patients as a subgroup but not for male patients. Conclusions The current method of assuming a 1 kg lung mass for all patients inaccurately estimates the lung absorbed dose in 90 Y radioembolization therapy. Using patient-specific lung masses resulted in estimated lung absorbed doses that were significantly different from those calculated using an assumed 1 kg lung mass for all patients. A personalized dosimetry method that includes individualized lung masses is necessary and can warrant a 90 Y dose reduction in some patients with lung masses smaller than 1 kg. Level of Evidence Level 3, Retrospective Study.