Assessing Subjective Visual Vertical Reliability: A Comparison of the “Bucket Test,” a Mobile App, and a Virtual System

The subjective visual vertical (SVV) is a potential indicator of vestibular dysfunction as it assesses an individual’s perception of a vertical line. Despite this, and as a result of specific logistical impediments, SVV has not entered standard clinical practice. Dizziness is the third most common c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering Vol. 20; no. 2; pp. 149 - 165
Main Authors Waly, Mohamed Ibrahim, Alshammari, Fahad, Alshammari, Maryam E., Algahtany, Mohammed
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.01.2024
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The subjective visual vertical (SVV) is a potential indicator of vestibular dysfunction as it assesses an individual’s perception of a vertical line. Despite this, and as a result of specific logistical impediments, SVV has not entered standard clinical practice. Dizziness is the third most common clinical complaint by patients (20%) in outpatient offices. It adversely affects the patient’s life and is often accompanied by intensive healthcare. This study aims to determine whether the bucket test and mobile phone app are as reliable as the Virtual SVV system in assessing the SVV. This study involves four types of investigation to determine the relationship or difference among three tests, including their performance comparison, descriptive analysis, one-way ANOVA test, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and correlation analysis. After organizing the raw data from 207 healthy volunteer participants for 8 trials, it was found that 59% were female and 41% were male. The data was analyzed utilizing the SPSS program. The test performance is measured using the ROC curve, and the results indicate that the bucket with the highest ROC coefficient is 0.72.
ISSN:2626-8493
2626-8493
DOI:10.3991/ijoe.v20i02.45981