Incidence and Predictors of Appropriate Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy in Japanese Ischemic Heart Disease Patients

• Published in: Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society
• Main Authors: Hanada, Kenji, Sasaki, Shingo, Kinjo, Takahiko, Shikanai, Shun, Yamazaki, Ken, Kato, Tomo, Tsushima, Michiko, Senoo, Maiko, Narita, Noritomo, Ichikawa, Hiroaki, Shibutani, Shuji, Yokoyama, Hiroaki, Yokota, Takashi, Okumura, Ken, Tomita, Hirofumi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Japan 11.10.2024
• Subjects: Ischemic heart disease; Secondary prevention; Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD); Primary prevention; Appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy
• ISSN: 1346-9843; 1347-4820; 1347-4820
• DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0436

Although the efficacy of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in preventing sudden cardiac death is well established, the incidence and predictors of appropriate ICD therapy in Japanese ischemic heart disease (IHD) patients remain unclear. We retrospectively studied Japanese 141 IHD patients undergoing transvenous ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation for primary or secondary prevention at Hirosaki University Hospital. Over a mean (±SD) follow-up period of 5.5±2.8 years, the incidence of appropriate ICD therapy was similar in the primary and secondary prevention groups, although it was relatively more frequent in the first 2 years in the secondary prevention group. Four patients died due to sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF), mainly due to post-shock pulseless electrical activity. Once patients had received their first appropriate ICD therapy, 49.2% received second appropriate ICD therapy within 6 months. Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that sustained VT as an index life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia before ICD/CRT-D implantation was an independent predictor of appropriate ICD therapy, but VF was not. The incidence of appropriate ICD therapy was comparable in primary and secondary prevention among Japanese IHD patients. We need to recognize the high-risk period for second appropriate ICD therapy after the first therapy and sustained VT as index life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmia as a risk factor for appropriate ICD therapy.