Building capacity for the children's workforce: findings from the knowledge review of the higher education response

In the UK, there is rapid and far‐reaching policy change designed to provide integrated services to children, young people and their families, linking education, social care, health, youth and community, criminal justice and other professions. Higher education institutions must play a significant ro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLearning in health and social care Vol. 7; no. 4; pp. 184 - 197
Main Authors Taylor, Imogen, Sharland, Elaine, Whiting, Russell
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2008
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1473-6853
1473-6861
DOI10.1111/j.1473-6861.2008.00200.x

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In the UK, there is rapid and far‐reaching policy change designed to provide integrated services to children, young people and their families, linking education, social care, health, youth and community, criminal justice and other professions. Higher education institutions must play a significant role in this process given the large proportion of its graduates who will join the Children's Workforce. In 2007, a University of Sussex team was commissioned by the Higher Education Academy Subject Centres for Social Policy and Social Work; Education; Health Sciences and Practice; Medicine, Dentistry and Veterinary Science; and Psychology, in collaboration with the Children's Workforce Development Council and the Children's Workforce Network to undertake a Knowledge Review of integrated children's services in higher education. In this paper, the authors explore the policy context for integrated children's services and its interaction with the educational and workforce agenda. They set out the process of the Knowledge Review and examine its findings thematically, drawing on activity theory. They suggest that to advance the integrated children's services agenda in higher education, four crucial issues need to be addressed: stakeholders need to provide a clear‐cut business case for investment; universities and regulators must address disciplinary and associated cultural barriers to change at all levels; funders must invest in supporting pilot initiatives and their evaluation; and finally, academics need to find ways to engage and sustain children, young people and their families in the development process.
Bibliography:ArticleID:LHS200
ark:/67375/WNG-XG6C6F96-K
istex:D8B03A8D51019E604AA2F773681079F6FEC30827
ISSN:1473-6853
1473-6861
DOI:10.1111/j.1473-6861.2008.00200.x