Political Networks

Political science is diverse in its methods, theories, and substantive interests. A quick perusal of our flagship journals reveals just how heterogeneous we are, with articles ranging from mathematical treatments of theoretical problems to textual exegesis of Plato, and qualitative studies of single...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPS, political science & politics Vol. 44; no. 1; pp. 39 - 43
Main Authors McClurg, Scott D., Young, Joseph K.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York, USA Cambridge University Press 01.01.2011
Subjects
Anthropologists
Boundaries
Experiments
Philosophers
Psychologists
Sociologists
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Political science is diverse in its methods, theories, and substantive interests. A quick perusal of our flagship journals reveals just how heterogeneous we are, with articles ranging from mathematical treatments of theoretical problems to textual exegesis of Plato, and qualitative studies of single countries standing in contrast to quantitative analyses of experiments designed to mobilize voters. At times, the discipline's boundaries are so fuzzy that our territory is alternatively claimed by philosophers, anthropologists, economists, sociologists, and psychologists.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1049-0965
1537-5935
DOI:10.1017/S1049096510001836