Post-windthrow differences of carbon and water fluxes between managed and unmanaged Norway spruce stands

• Published in: Agricultural and forest meteorology Vol. 355; p. 110102
• Main Authors: Petrík, Peter, Fleischer, Peter, Tomes, Jakub, Pichler, Viliam
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 15.08.2024
• Subjects: Disturbance; Ecosystem respiration; Gross primary production; Net ecosystem production; Vegetation diversity; Water-use efficiency; Gross primary production; Vegetation diversity; Net ecosystem production; Water-use efficiency; Disturbance; Ecosystem respiration
• ISSN: 0168-1923; 1873-2240
• DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110102

•Eddy-covariance was used at two forest sites disturbed by windthrow with contrasting management.•Unmanaged site showed greater gross primary production but also higher ecosystem respiration.•Both sites showed similar levels of evapotranspiration.•The managed site had lower gross but higher net water-use efficiency compared to unmanaged site.•The unmanaged site turned into net carbon sink 17 years after windthrow. Windthrow is a major forest disturbance source in Europe. The impact of management (salvage logging) and no-management (deadwood left in ecosystem) treatments on carbon and water fluxes of Norway spruce stand affected by windthrow were analysed. The net ecosystem production (NEP), gross primary production (GPP), ecosystem respiration (Reco) and evapotranspiration (ET) were measured with eddy-covariance tower during 2019–2022 period. Additional chamber gas-exchange measurements, and vegetation inventory were performed. The unmanaged site had greater vegetation diversity and plant abundance, with higher leaf area index (LAI). The managed site showed overall higher NEP, lower GPP, lower Reco, lower GPP based water-use efficiency (WUEGPP), but higher NEP based WUENEP, compared with unmanaged site. The ET showed no clear trend between the two treatments. The higher GPP of unmanaged site can be linked to greater abundance of herbaceous species, which showed significantly higher photosynthetic capacity than the tree species. Moreover, the higher WUEGPP of unmanaged site can be affected also by the higher LAI of the unmanaged site. Nevertheless, if the Reco is accounted for in WUENEP, the differences between sites are reversed and the unmanaged site had lower WUENEP compared to the managed site. The option to leave the disturbed site without management leads to more productive ecosystem (GPP), with greater species diversity and abundance, but also with greater Reco and lower WUENEP. The discrepancy between WUEGPP and WUENEP suggests that studies analysing natural ecosystems affected by disturbances should use WUENEP to account for Reco carbon losses and avoid mis-interpreting the ecosystem carbon-water balance with WUEGPP. [Display omitted]