Quality of Life in Patients With K-RAS Wild-Type Colorectal Cancer: The CO.20 Phase 3 Randomized Trial

The CO.20 trial randomized patients with K-RAS wild-type, chemotherapy-refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer to receive cetuximab (CET) plus brivanib alaninate (BRIV) or CET plus placebo (CET/placebo). Quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCancer Vol. 120; no. 2; pp. 181 - 189
Main Authors RINGASH, Jolie, AU, Heather-Jane, ALCINDOR, Thierry, NG, Siobhan, SALIM, Muhammad, SABESAN, Sabe, EASAW, Jay C, SHANNON, Jenny, EL-TAHCHE, Fabyolla, WALTERS, Ian, DONGSHENG TU, O'CALLAGHAN, Christopher J, SIU, Lillian L, SHAPIRO, Jeremy D, JONKER, Derek J, ZALCBERG, John R, MOORE, Malcolm J, STRICKLAND, Andrew, KOTB, Rami, JEFFERY, Mark
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken, NJ Wiley-Blackwell 15.01.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The CO.20 trial randomized patients with K-RAS wild-type, chemotherapy-refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer to receive cetuximab (CET) plus brivanib alaninate (BRIV) or CET plus placebo (CET/placebo). Quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 at baseline and at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, and 24 weeks until disease progression. Predefined coprimary QoL endpoints were time to deterioration (first worsening from baseline of ≥ 10 points) on the Physical Function (PF) and Global (GHS) scales. Of 750 randomized patients, 721 (358 of whom received CET/BRIV) were assessable for QoL. QoL compliance and baseline PF and GHS scores did not differ by treatment arm. The median time to deterioration was 1.6 months versus 1.1 months for GHS (P =.02) and 5.6 months versus 1.7 months for PF (P <.0001) favoring CET/placebo. Secondary analysis favored CET/placebo for QOL response on the PF, Cognitive Function, Fatigue, Nausea, Appetite, and Diarrhea scales. A greater percentage of patients on the CET/BRIV arm had PF worsening at 6 weeks (31% vs 17%). Clinical adverse events of ≥ grade 3 were more common with CET/BRIV than with CET/placebo, including fatigue (25% vs 11%), hypertension, rash, diarrhea, abdominal pain, dehydration, and anorexia. Compared with CET/placebo, the combination of CET/BRIV worsened time to QoL deterioration for patients with K-RAS wild-type, chemotherapy-refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer on the PF and GHS scales of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30. This result may be due to higher rates of fatigue and gastrointestinal adverse events.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-News-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0008-543X
1097-0142
DOI:10.1002/cncr.28410