Otra controvertida relación maestro-discípulo. Pierre Bourdieu & Luc Boltanski, en torno al problema de la acción y la axiología del investigador

This article seeks to measure the differences between the structural constructivist sociology of P. Bourdieu and the pragmatic sociology of L. Boltanski. We chose to cover some axes of the works of both authors, proposing in each one hypothesis of rupture or continuity. First, the way they define th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRevista Latinoamericana de metodología de las ciencias sociales Vol. 8; no. 1; p. e033
Main Authors Nardacchione, Gabriel, Tovillas, Pablo
Format Journal Article
LanguageSpanish
Published Ensenada Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educacion 01.01.2018
Universidad Nacional de La Plata
Subjects
Action regime
Boltanski, Luc
Bourdieu, Pierre (1930-2002)
Campo
Constructivism
Constructivismo
Estructural
Estructural-constructivismo
Field
Habitus
Political ethics
Pragmatic sociology
Prueba
Régimen de acción
Sociology
Sociología pragmática
Structural
Test
Values
Ética política
Argentina
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:This article seeks to measure the differences between the structural constructivist sociology of P. Bourdieu and the pragmatic sociology of L. Boltanski. We chose to cover some axes of the works of both authors, proposing in each one hypothesis of rupture or continuity. First, the way they define the problem of the action and how it is generated. Second, the spaces in which the action takes place and in what way they condition it. And finally, how they deal with the problem of political-ethics and the axiological dimension of the sociologist's work.
ISSN:1853-7863
1853-7863
DOI:10.24215/18537863e033