OR03-3 Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) on Lifestyle Modifications in Individuals with Prediabetes

• Published in: Journal of the Endocrine Society Vol. 6; no. Supplement_1; pp. A348 - A349
• Main Authors: Khan, Shanzay, Muhammad, Chalak, Munir, Kashif, Patel, Alpa, Patel, Amani, Rabiei-Flori, Elham, Reddy, Rashmi, Farhan, Hisham
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: US Oxford University Press 01.11.2022
• Subjects: Diabetes & Glucose Metabolism
• ISSN: 2472-1972; 2472-1972
• DOI: 10.1210/jendso/bvac150.724

Abstract Introduction Adherence to lifestyle modifications can prevent diabetes; however, this poses a challenge for most individuals. CGM is an effective tool for glycemic control and lifestyle modifications in patients with diabetes on insulin therapy. We explored the impact of CGM use in individuals with prediabetes. Hypothesis Individuals using CGM in addition to diabetes education will show improved adherence to lifestyle modifications and greater reduction of HbA1c as compared to those receiving diabetes education alone.Design57 individuals with prediabetes were randomized to use CGM for 3 months along with diabetes education (CGM group) or receive diabetes education alone (EDU group). Food frequency (UKDDQ) and physical activity (IPAQ) questionnaires were completed by participants at the beginning and at the end of the study (6 months). Primary outcomes were lifestyle modifications and changes in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were changes in weight and blood pressure. Results Both groups reported an increase in healthy food choices; however, EDU group performed better (EDU: 12.4 vs 9.2, p<0.01, CGM: 10.6 vs 9.5, p 0.08). Unhealthy food choices were reduced in both groups. CGM group reported a greater increase in moderate physical activity levels (CGM: 230 vs 61 minutes/week, p 0.01, EDU: 78.5 vs 48 minutes/week, p 0.22). Vigorous physical activity was reported by more individuals in CGM group than EDU (35% vs 4%). Greater reduction in mean HbA1c was noted in CGM group (5.7 vs 5.9%, p 0.05) compared to EDU (5.8 vs 5.9%, p 0.01). 33% of participants in both groups had normalization of HbA1c at the end of study. CGM group had greater reduction in weight (3.5 vs 0.8 lb, p 0.1) and systolic BP (12 vs 2.4 mmHg, p 0.01) than EDU. Irrespective of group assignment, the study population had improvement in all outcomes despite the beginning of COVID-19 pandemic during 4th month of the study. Smaller number of participants in the CGM group reported negative impact of the pandemic on their lifestyle modifications than EDU (Diet: 68% vs 80%, Physical activity: 48% vs 64%). Majority of CGM group participants were able to maintain lifestyle changes after discontinuing CGM use (Diet: 72%, Physical activity: 84%). On comparing both interventions, 56% of CGM group participants felt CGM to be more helpful than education for lifestyle modifications, while 40% felt both interventions helped equally. Conclusions CGM use in addition to diabetes education resulted in improvement in physical activity, food choices, HbA1c, weight, and BP in individuals with prediabetes. The significance of diabetes education was noted by greater improvement in food choices in EDU group. CGM can be an effective tool for diabetes prevention with lifestyle modifications in prediabetes. The long-term impact of CGM use and cost-benefit analysis in high-risk patients needs to be explored further. Presentation: Saturday, June 11, 2022 12:00 p.m. - 12:15 p.m.