Progression to Overt or Silent CAD in Asymptomatic Patients With Diabetes Mellitus at High Coronary Risk

• Published in: JACC. Cardiovascular imaging Vol. 7; no. 10; pp. 1001 - 1010
• Main Authors: Zellweger, Michael J., MD, Maraun, Michael, MD, Osterhues, Hans H., MD, Keller, Ulrich, MD, Müller-Brand, Jan, MD, Jeger, Raban, MD, Pfister, Otmar, MD, Burkard, Thilo, MD, Eckstein, Friedrich, MD, von Felten, Stefanie, PhD, Osswald, Stefan, MD, Pfisterer, Matthias, MD
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 01.10.2014
• Subjects: Cardiovascular; coronary artery disease; treatment; MPS; myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography; risk stratification; major adverse cardiac events; MACE; myocardial perfusion SPECT; CAD; diabetes type 2; silent ischemia
• ISSN: 1936-878X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.07.010

Abstract Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate prevalence, progression, treatment, and outcome of silent coronary artery disease (CAD) in asymptomatic patients with diabetes (DM) at high coronary risk. Background Despite the close association of diabetes and CAD, general CAD screening in asymptomatic patients with DM is discouraged even though outcome data in patients at high coronary risk are lacking. Methods Prospective multicenter outcome study—with a pilot randomized treatment substudy. The study comprised 400 asymptomatic patients with DM (type 2) without history or symptoms of CAD at high CAD risk. They underwent clinical evaluation and myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (MPS) at baseline and after 2 years. Patients with normal MPS received usual care; those with abnormal MPS received medical or combined invasive and medical management. Results An abnormal MPS was found in 87 of 400 patients (22%). In patients with normal MPS, MACE occurred in 2.9% and ischemia or new scar in 3.2%. Patients with abnormal MPS had more MACE (9.8%; hazard ratio: 3.44; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32 to 8.95; p = 0.011) and ischemia or new scar (34.2%; odds ratio: 15.91; 95% CI: 7.24 to 38.03; p < 0.001) despite therapy, resulting in “overt or silent CAD progression” of 35.6% versus 4.6% (odds ratio: 11.53; 95% CI: 5.63 to 24.70; p < 0.001). Patients with abnormal MPS randomized to medical versus invasive-medical strategies had similar event rates (p = 0.215), but more ischemic or new scar findings (54.3% vs. 15.8%; p < 0.001). Conclusions High-risk asymptomatic patients with DM and normal MPS (78%) have a low rate of first manifestations of CAD. Patients with abnormal MPS at baseline (22%) have a 7-fold higher rate of progression to “overt or silent CAD,” despite therapy. Randomized patients’ outcomes suggest that a combined invasive and medical strategy for silent CAD may reduce scintigraphic but not symptomatic CAD progression versus medical therapy alone. (Trial of Invasive versus Medical therapy of Early coronary artery disease in Diabetes Mellitus ISRCTN87953632 ).