Assessing Potential Bias in PFAS Concentrations in Groundwater and Surface Water Samples

• Published in: Ground water monitoring & remediation Vol. 44; no. 3; pp. 28 - 37
• Main Authors: Wanzek, Tom, McIntyre, Hannah, Hawley, Elisabeth, Deeb, Rula, Bogdan, Dorin, Shaefer, Charles, DiGuiseppi, Bill, Struse, Amanda, Schwichtenberg, Trever, Field, Jennifer
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Malden, USA Wiley Periodicals, Inc 01.06.2024; Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
• Subjects: Air sampling; Air-water interface; Anthropogenic factors; Best practice; Best practices; Bias; Cost analysis; Drinking water; Fluoropolymers; Groundwater; Industrial products; Interfaces; Laboratories; Literature reviews; Perfluoroalkyl & polyfluoroalkyl substances; Perfluorochemicals; Sample storage; Surface microlayer; Surface microlayers; Surface water; Surface-groundwater relations; Water analysis; Water quality; Water quality standards; Water sampling
• ISSN: 1069-3629; 1745-6592
• DOI: 10.1111/gwmr.12669

Per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) encompass a large group of recalcitrant anthropogenic compounds that have been used in a variety of consumer and industrial products and processes over many decades. Drinking water standards were recently finalized for two PFAS at low nanogram per liter concentrations. Due to the widespread use of PFAS and low health‐based thresholds, a literature review and laboratory and field studies were conducted to assess several potential sources of bias in PFAS concentrations. Fluoropolymers are commonly present in equipment, products, and materials used during field sampling, potentially leading to false positive results. Laboratory results confirmed the presence of PFAS in multiple commonly used field materials. However, best practices can be used to limit pathways for cross contamination. Laboratory‐specified hold times and sample storage temperatures are scientifically founded and adequately prevent bias due to PFAS sorption to sampling containers or partial degradation of some PFAS to form others. PFAS are also known to accumulate at the air‐water interface and other interfaces. Results from laboratory and field studies indicate that PFAS enrichment in foam and in the surface microlayer does occur. However, the effect of this phenomenon is within the range of analytical and spatial sampling variability and therefore a change in sampling procedures is not needed. Findings were distilled into science‐based and practical recommendations to minimize bias during PFAS sampling without incurring unnecessary cost and effort.