Investigating the perceptions of self‐efficacy of in‐field and out‐of‐field home economics teachers

Out‐of‐field teaching is a strategy employed to address global teacher shortages. This study compares Australian in‐field and out‐of‐field teacher effectiveness perceptions when teaching home economics. An online survey (N = 194) identified statistically significant findings that negatively impact t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFamily and consumer sciences research journal Vol. 53; no. 3
Main Authors Pendergast, Donna, McManus, Sarah, Du Plessis, Anna, Deagon, Jay
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.03.2025
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1077-727X
1552-3934
DOI10.1111/fcsr.70006

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Out‐of‐field teaching is a strategy employed to address global teacher shortages. This study compares Australian in‐field and out‐of‐field teacher effectiveness perceptions when teaching home economics. An online survey (N = 194) identified statistically significant findings that negatively impact the subject, teachers, and students: in‐field teachers report they are more effective than out‐of‐field teachers, while out‐of‐field teachers claim they are equally effective; in‐field and out‐of‐field teachers report declines in self‐efficacy and well‐being when teaching out‐of‐field; out‐of‐field teachers use narrower subject skills, safety, and knowledge. Professional learning, skill development, resource provision, support/mentoring, planning time, and strategic hiring are suggested to address out‐of‐field teaching challenges.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ISSN:1077-727X
1552-3934
DOI:10.1111/fcsr.70006