Do firms with environmental, social, and governance reputational risk take into account board gender diversity? An analysis on a global scale

• Published in: Social science quarterly Vol. 105; no. 4; pp. 1396 - 1418
• Main Authors: Tran, Mai‐Minh‐Anh, Nguyen, Ngoc‐Yen‐Chi, Quyen, Nguyen‐Khanh‐Ha, Tran, Phuong‐Nhu, Phan, Nguyen‐Minh‐Thu, Le, Anh‐Tuan
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.07.2024
• Subjects: board gender diversity; Developed countries; developing countries; ESG reputational risk; gender equality; Gender equity; Gender inequality; Generalized method of moments; Governance; Multiculturalism & pluralism; Risk; Risk factors; Women
• ISSN: 0038-4941; 1540-6237
• DOI: 10.1111/ssqu.13411

Objective This article studies whether a firm's environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reputational risk influences board gender diversity. Besides, we are also interested in the moderating role of gender equality and country development level toward the relationship between reputational risk and board gender diversity. Method Using a comprehensive sample of firms from 52 countries between 2007 and 2019, we employ multiple regression with fixed effects. Our findings remain robust when using alternative measures of variables and addressing endogeneity concerns by employing a two‐stage systems generalized method of moments estimation and an instrumental variable approach. Results Companies with high levels of ESG reputational risk tend to add more women directors to resolve these problems. Furthermore, the empirical results point out that the positive impact of ESG reputational risk on board gender diversity is more pronounced for countries with a higher degree of gender equality or developed countries. Conclusions Overall, our study is the first international study to link ESG reputational risk via media channels to board gender diversity.