FlowCorrGCN: Enhancing Flow Correlation Through Graph Convolutional Networks and Triplet Networks

• Published in: International journal of intelligent systems Vol. 2024; no. 1
• Main Authors: Zhai, Jiangtao, Zhang, Kaijie, Zeng, Xiaolong, Meng, Yufei, Liu, Guangjie
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: New York John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.01.2024
• Subjects: Accuracy; Algorithms; Artificial neural networks; Communication; Communications traffic; Correlation; Correlation analysis; Data encryption; Deep learning; Feature extraction; Flow mapping; Graph neural networks; Graph representations; Graphical representations; Methods; Neural networks; Privacy; Topology; Traffic flow
• ISSN: 0884-8173; 1098-111X
• DOI: 10.1155/2024/8823511

Anonymous network tracing is a significant research subject in the field of network security, and flow correlation technology serves as a fundamental technique for deanonymizing network traffic. Existing flow correlation techniques are considered ineffective and unreliable when applied on a large scale because they exhibit high false‐positive rates or require impractically long periods of traffic observation to achieve reliable correlations. To address this issue, this paper proposed an innovative flow correlation approach for the typical and most widely used Tor anonymous network by combining graph convolutional neural networks with triplet networks. Our proposed method involves extracting features such as packet intervals, packet lengths, and directions from Tor network traffic and encoding each flow into a graph representation. The integration of triplet networks enhances the internode relationships, which can effectively fuse flow representations with node associations. The graph convolutional neural network extracts features from the input graph topology, mapping them to distinct representations in the embedding space, thus effectively distinguishing different Tor flows. Experimental results demonstrate that with a false‐positive rate as low as 0.1%, the correlation accuracy reaches 86.4%, showcasing a 5.1% accuracy improvement compared to the existing state‐of‐the‐art methods.