Three-source partitioning of soil respiration by 13C natural abundance and its variation with soil depth in a plantation

Partitioning soil respiration into three components is vital to identify CO₂ sink or source and can help us better understand soil carbon dynamics. However, knowledge about the influences of soil depth and the priming effect on soil respiration components under field has been limited. Three componen...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of forestry research Vol. 27; no. 3; pp. 533 - 540
Main Authors Song, Wenchen, Tong, Xiaojuan, Zhang, Jinsong, Meng, Ping
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Harbin Northeast Forestry University 2016
College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China%Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Partitioning soil respiration into three components is vital to identify CO₂ sink or source and can help us better understand soil carbon dynamics. However, knowledge about the influences of soil depth and the priming effect on soil respiration components under field has been limited. Three components of soil respiration (root respiration, rhizomicrobial respiration and basal respiration) in a plantation in the hilly area of the North China were separated by the ¹³C natural abundance method. The results showed that the average proportions of rhizomicrobial respiration, root respiration and basal respiration at the 25–65 cm depths were about 14, 23 and 63 %, respectively. Three components of soil respiration varied with soil depth, and root respiration was the main component of soil respiration in deeper soil. The priming effect was obvious for the deep soil respiration, especially at the 40–50 cm depth. Thus, depth and priming effect should be taken into account to increase the accuracy of estimations of soil carbon flux.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11676-015-0206-x
ISSN:1007-662X
1993-0607
DOI:10.1007/s11676-015-0206-x