How to deal with an "essentially contested concept" on the field? Sampling social innovations through the Delphi method

How to select cases in social innovation research? Sampling units of analysis is indeed a challenging methodological question since social innovation theory is controversial and fragmented. In the absence of any database and given the limits of conventional techniques, sampling is only possible thro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean public & social innovation review Vol. 2; no. 1; pp. 45 - 58
Main Authors Callorda Fossati, Ela, Degavre, Florence, Nyssens, Marthe
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published HISIN 01.06.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract How to select cases in social innovation research? Sampling units of analysis is indeed a challenging methodological question since social innovation theory is controversial and fragmented. In the absence of any database and given the limits of conventional techniques, sampling is only possible through participative methods that make sense of opposing perceptions and contestedness. This article presents the Delphi method and its related principles of expertise, iterative consultation and consensus forming and shows how it served to identify a pool of cases of social innovation, sort them out and finally establish a sample of social innovations in a partnership research on innovative practices in domiciliary eldercare.
AbstractList How to select cases in social innovation research? Sampling units of analysis is indeed a challenging methodological question since social innovation theory is controversial and fragmented. In the absence of any database and given the limits of conventional techniques, sampling is only possible through participative methods that make sense of opposing perceptions and contestedness. This article presents the Delphi method and its related principles of expertise, iterative consultation and consensus forming and shows how it served to identify a pool of cases of social innovation, sort them out and finally establish a sample of social innovations in a partnership research on innovative practices in domiciliary eldercare.
Author Nyssens, Marthe
Degavre, Florence
Callorda Fossati, Ela
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ela
  surname: Callorda Fossati
  fullname: Callorda Fossati, Ela
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Florence
  surname: Degavre
  fullname: Degavre, Florence
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Marthe
  surname: Nyssens
  fullname: Nyssens, Marthe
BookMark eNptkUtLJDEUhcPQwjjq0n1wX22lUqlUVsPgPGxocKGuQyq56YqkkyLJTNP_3rJUkMHVPVzOd7iPb2gVYgCELkm9pqSj_Bqm7NKa8Iqs2y_otGGNqETftKsP-iu6yPmprutmZvquPUWH23jAJWIDyuODKyNWAV9BzhCKU94fsY6hQC5gXpSGqVzhGHAZAVsH3nzH92o_eRd2OEc9I9iFEP-p4mLIsy3Fv7txsf8EP40O76GM0ZyjE6t8hou3eoYef_96uLmttnd_Njc_tpUmPW8rwYTlljDCGy4GMtgeuOnYwK1l1ghOKActrBWiAUGIHUQnQLW2p0PTddzQM7R5zTVRPckpub1KRxmVk0sjpp1UqTjtQVJCNQyDNsroFgyZ78M0pz2njHLWsjmLvmbpFHNOYKV2ZVm0JOW8JLVcXiGXV0jCJZHtTFX_Ue9TfO5_BgyWkEI
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_31637_epsir_2025_1421
crossref_primary_10_4000_regulation_12980
crossref_primary_10_1080_13639080_2023_2231351
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_respol_2020_104080
crossref_primary_10_1111_apce_12265
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_erss_2024_103720
ContentType Journal Article
CorporateAuthor Université catholique de Louvain
CorporateAuthor_xml – name: Université catholique de Louvain
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
DOA
DOI 10.31637/epsir.17-1.4
DatabaseName CrossRef
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
DatabaseTitleList
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Sociology & Social History
EISSN 2529-9824
EndPage 58
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_313cebbcdadc4ed18645c73873537545
10_31637_epsir_17_1_4
GroupedDBID AAYXX
ADBBV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
BCNDV
CITATION
GROUPED_DOAJ
M~E
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c1874-959f7f1517279b1bf8e7d65b7ff5fd97137ec9ff992e911fb969ea4f83b2667d3
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 2529-9824
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:30:58 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:11:38 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:27:34 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1874-959f7f1517279b1bf8e7d65b7ff5fd97137ec9ff992e911fb969ea4f83b2667d3
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/313cebbcdadc4ed18645c73873537545
PageCount 14
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_313cebbcdadc4ed18645c73873537545
crossref_citationtrail_10_31637_epsir_17_1_4
crossref_primary_10_31637_epsir_17_1_4
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-06-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-06-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationTitle European public & social innovation review
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher HISIN
Publisher_xml – name: HISIN
SSID ssj0002316864
Score 1.9921005
Snippet How to select cases in social innovation research? Sampling units of analysis is indeed a challenging methodological question since social innovation theory is...
SourceID doaj
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Enrichment Source
Index Database
StartPage 45
SubjectTerms Consensus -based methods
Delphi method
Essentially contested concept
Multiple case study design
Sampling
Social innovation
Transdisciplinary research
Title How to deal with an "essentially contested concept" on the field? Sampling social innovations through the Delphi method
URI https://doaj.org/article/313cebbcdadc4ed18645c73873537545
Volume 2
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LSwMxEA7Skxfxia0PBpGe3LbbTTabk_gqRdCLFnpbNi-tlG1pK6X_3kmylnoQL97CMizLZDbzzTD5PkIuVaZji9EbZYVOIpoWKpIZ60SGMYMxU_COvy729Jz2B_RxyIYbUl9uJizQAwfHtZM4UUZKpQutqNFxllKmeJLxhDn1Vs9eijlvo5j68CQucYqWgVQT1wlvm-l8NGvhmRy36I8ktMHV75NKb5fsVGgQbsJX7JEtU-6TxvoSCTQhXJ-FwOaxOiDL_mQJiwloBHjgmqhQlHDhCMBL_FfH4xW44XPfxHQrN7RyAZMSEOeBn1a7hpfCTZGXbxD65TBaC6POoZLt8eb3Zjx9H0HQmD4kg97D610_qsQTIuVk9iLBhOUW8zkCFCFjaTPDdcokt5ZZLbA25UYJa4XoGjzwrBSpMAW1WSIxZ3OdHJFaOSnNMQFppKZMF9QpkxiDBSFHUIZbwmnaUd1unVx9ezNXFbO4E7gY51hheOfn3vl5zPM4p3XSXJtPA6XGb4a3bmvWRo4J2z_A-Mir-Mj_io_Gf7zkhGx3XTr33ZdTUlvMPs0ZgpGFPPdx9wURBN_s
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How+to+deal+with+an+%22essentially+contested+concept%22+on+the+field%3F+Sampling+social+innovations+through+the+Delphi+method&rft.jtitle=European+public+%26+social+innovation+review&rft.au=Ela+Callorda+Fossati&rft.au=Florence+Degavre&rft.au=Marthe+Nyssens&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.pub=HISIN&rft.eissn=2529-9824&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=58&rft_id=info:doi/10.31637%2Fepsir.17-1.4&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_313cebbcdadc4ed18645c73873537545
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2529-9824&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2529-9824&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2529-9824&client=summon