How to deal with an "essentially contested concept" on the field? Sampling social innovations through the Delphi method
How to select cases in social innovation research? Sampling units of analysis is indeed a challenging methodological question since social innovation theory is controversial and fragmented. In the absence of any database and given the limits of conventional techniques, sampling is only possible thro...
Saved in:
Published in | European public & social innovation review Vol. 2; no. 1; pp. 45 - 58 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
HISIN
01.06.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | How to select cases in social innovation research? Sampling units of analysis is indeed a challenging methodological question since social innovation theory is controversial and fragmented. In the absence of any database and given the limits of conventional techniques, sampling is only possible through participative methods that make sense of opposing perceptions and contestedness. This article presents the Delphi method and its related principles of expertise, iterative consultation and consensus forming and shows how it served to identify a pool of cases of social innovation, sort them out and finally establish a sample of social innovations in a partnership research on innovative practices in domiciliary eldercare. |
---|---|
AbstractList | How to select cases in social innovation research? Sampling units of analysis is indeed a challenging methodological question since social innovation theory is controversial and fragmented. In the absence of any database and given the limits of conventional techniques, sampling is only possible through participative methods that make sense of opposing perceptions and contestedness. This article presents the Delphi method and its related principles of expertise, iterative consultation and consensus forming and shows how it served to identify a pool of cases of social innovation, sort them out and finally establish a sample of social innovations in a partnership research on innovative practices in domiciliary eldercare. |
Author | Nyssens, Marthe Degavre, Florence Callorda Fossati, Ela |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ela surname: Callorda Fossati fullname: Callorda Fossati, Ela – sequence: 2 givenname: Florence surname: Degavre fullname: Degavre, Florence – sequence: 3 givenname: Marthe surname: Nyssens fullname: Nyssens, Marthe |
BookMark | eNptkUtLJDEUhcPQwjjq0n1wX22lUqlUVsPgPGxocKGuQyq56YqkkyLJTNP_3rJUkMHVPVzOd7iPb2gVYgCELkm9pqSj_Bqm7NKa8Iqs2y_otGGNqETftKsP-iu6yPmprutmZvquPUWH23jAJWIDyuODKyNWAV9BzhCKU94fsY6hQC5gXpSGqVzhGHAZAVsH3nzH92o_eRd2OEc9I9iFEP-p4mLIsy3Fv7txsf8EP40O76GM0ZyjE6t8hou3eoYef_96uLmttnd_Njc_tpUmPW8rwYTlljDCGy4GMtgeuOnYwK1l1ghOKActrBWiAUGIHUQnQLW2p0PTddzQM7R5zTVRPckpub1KRxmVk0sjpp1UqTjtQVJCNQyDNsroFgyZ78M0pz2njHLWsjmLvmbpFHNOYKV2ZVm0JOW8JLVcXiGXV0jCJZHtTFX_Ue9TfO5_BgyWkEI |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_31637_epsir_2025_1421 crossref_primary_10_4000_regulation_12980 crossref_primary_10_1080_13639080_2023_2231351 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_respol_2020_104080 crossref_primary_10_1111_apce_12265 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_erss_2024_103720 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
CorporateAuthor | Université catholique de Louvain |
CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: Université catholique de Louvain |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION DOA |
DOI | 10.31637/epsir.17-1.4 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef |
DatabaseTitleList | |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Sociology & Social History |
EISSN | 2529-9824 |
EndPage | 58 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_313cebbcdadc4ed18645c73873537545 10_31637_epsir_17_1_4 |
GroupedDBID | AAYXX ADBBV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS BCNDV CITATION GROUPED_DOAJ M~E |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c1874-959f7f1517279b1bf8e7d65b7ff5fd97137ec9ff992e911fb969ea4f83b2667d3 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 2529-9824 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:30:58 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:11:38 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:27:34 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c1874-959f7f1517279b1bf8e7d65b7ff5fd97137ec9ff992e911fb969ea4f83b2667d3 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/313cebbcdadc4ed18645c73873537545 |
PageCount | 14 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_313cebbcdadc4ed18645c73873537545 crossref_citationtrail_10_31637_epsir_17_1_4 crossref_primary_10_31637_epsir_17_1_4 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2017-06-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-06-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2017 text: 2017-06-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationTitle | European public & social innovation review |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | HISIN |
Publisher_xml | – name: HISIN |
SSID | ssj0002316864 |
Score | 1.9921005 |
Snippet | How to select cases in social innovation research? Sampling units of analysis is indeed a challenging methodological question since social innovation theory is... |
SourceID | doaj crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Enrichment Source Index Database |
StartPage | 45 |
SubjectTerms | Consensus -based methods Delphi method Essentially contested concept Multiple case study design Sampling Social innovation Transdisciplinary research |
Title | How to deal with an "essentially contested concept" on the field? Sampling social innovations through the Delphi method |
URI | https://doaj.org/article/313cebbcdadc4ed18645c73873537545 |
Volume | 2 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1LSwMxEA7Skxfxia0PBpGe3LbbTTabk_gqRdCLFnpbNi-tlG1pK6X_3kmylnoQL97CMizLZDbzzTD5PkIuVaZji9EbZYVOIpoWKpIZ60SGMYMxU_COvy729Jz2B_RxyIYbUl9uJizQAwfHtZM4UUZKpQutqNFxllKmeJLxhDn1Vs9eijlvo5j68CQucYqWgVQT1wlvm-l8NGvhmRy36I8ktMHV75NKb5fsVGgQbsJX7JEtU-6TxvoSCTQhXJ-FwOaxOiDL_mQJiwloBHjgmqhQlHDhCMBL_FfH4xW44XPfxHQrN7RyAZMSEOeBn1a7hpfCTZGXbxD65TBaC6POoZLt8eb3Zjx9H0HQmD4kg97D610_qsQTIuVk9iLBhOUW8zkCFCFjaTPDdcokt5ZZLbA25UYJa4XoGjzwrBSpMAW1WSIxZ3OdHJFaOSnNMQFppKZMF9QpkxiDBSFHUIZbwmnaUd1unVx9ezNXFbO4E7gY51hheOfn3vl5zPM4p3XSXJtPA6XGb4a3bmvWRo4J2z_A-Mir-Mj_io_Gf7zkhGx3XTr33ZdTUlvMPs0ZgpGFPPdx9wURBN_s |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How+to+deal+with+an+%22essentially+contested+concept%22+on+the+field%3F+Sampling+social+innovations+through+the+Delphi+method&rft.jtitle=European+public+%26+social+innovation+review&rft.au=Ela+Callorda+Fossati&rft.au=Florence+Degavre&rft.au=Marthe+Nyssens&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.pub=HISIN&rft.eissn=2529-9824&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=58&rft_id=info:doi/10.31637%2Fepsir.17-1.4&rft.externalDBID=DOA&rft.externalDocID=oai_doaj_org_article_313cebbcdadc4ed18645c73873537545 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2529-9824&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2529-9824&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2529-9824&client=summon |