How to deal with an "essentially contested concept" on the field? Sampling social innovations through the Delphi method

How to select cases in social innovation research? Sampling units of analysis is indeed a challenging methodological question since social innovation theory is controversial and fragmented. In the absence of any database and given the limits of conventional techniques, sampling is only possible thro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean public & social innovation review Vol. 2; no. 1; pp. 45 - 58
Main Authors Callorda Fossati, Ela, Degavre, Florence, Nyssens, Marthe
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published HISIN 01.06.2017
Subjects
Consensus -based methods
Delphi method
Essentially contested concept
Multiple case study design
Sampling
Social innovation
Transdisciplinary research
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:How to select cases in social innovation research? Sampling units of analysis is indeed a challenging methodological question since social innovation theory is controversial and fragmented. In the absence of any database and given the limits of conventional techniques, sampling is only possible through participative methods that make sense of opposing perceptions and contestedness. This article presents the Delphi method and its related principles of expertise, iterative consultation and consensus forming and shows how it served to identify a pool of cases of social innovation, sort them out and finally establish a sample of social innovations in a partnership research on innovative practices in domiciliary eldercare.
ISSN:2529-9824
2529-9824
DOI:10.31637/epsir.17-1.4