Efficacy and safety of tesamorelin in people with HIV on integrase inhibitors

Tesamorelin is the only FDA-approved therapy to treat abdominal fat accumulation in people with HIV (PWH). Phase III clinical trials were conducted prior to the introduction of integrase inhibitors (INSTIs), which are now a mainstay of HIV antiretroviral therapy. We leveraged a randomized double-bli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAIDS (London) Vol. 38; no. 12; pp. 1758 - 1764
Main Authors Russo, Samuel C, Ockene, Mollie W, Arpante, Allison K, Johnson, Julia E, Lee, Hang, Toribio, Mabel, Stanley, Takara L, Hadigan, Colleen M, Grinspoon, Steven K, Erlandson, Kristine M, Fourman, Lindsay T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England 01.10.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Tesamorelin is the only FDA-approved therapy to treat abdominal fat accumulation in people with HIV (PWH). Phase III clinical trials were conducted prior to the introduction of integrase inhibitors (INSTIs), which are now a mainstay of HIV antiretroviral therapy. We leveraged a randomized double-blind trial of 61 PWH and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tesamorelin 2 mg once daily vs. identical placebo among participants on INSTI-based regimens at baseline. In the parent clinical trial, visceral fat cross-sectional area, hepatic fat fraction, and trunk-to-appendicular fat ratio were quantified using magnetic resonance imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, respectively, at baseline and 12 months. Metabolic and safety outcomes were compared between treatment arms. Among 38 participants on INSTI-based regimens at baseline, 15 individuals on tesamorelin and 16 individuals on placebo completed the 12-month study. Tesamorelin led to significant declines in visceral fat (median [interquartile range]: -25 [-93, -2] vs. 14 [3, 41] cm 2 , P  = 0.001), hepatic fat (-4.2% [-12.3%, -2.7%] vs. -0.5% [-3.9%, 2.7%], P  = 0.01), and trunk-to-appendicular fat ratio (-0.1 [-0.3, 0.0] vs. 0.0 [-0.1, 0.1], P  = 0.03). Tesamorelin was well tolerated with a similar frequency of adverse events, including hyperglycemia, between groups. The current analysis provides the first dedicated data on the efficacy and safety of tesamorelin among PWH on INSTI-based regimens. Despite the association of INSTI use with weight gain and adipose tissue dysfunction, tesamorelin had beneficial effects on body composition with no exacerbation of glycemic control.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ISSN:0269-9370
1473-5571
1473-5571
DOI:10.1097/QAD.0000000000003965