Growing small solid nodules in lung cancer screening: safety and efficacy of a 200 mm 3 minimum size threshold for multidisciplinary team referral

• Published in: Thorax Vol. 78; no. 2; pp. 202 - 206
• Main Authors: Creamer, Andrew W, Horst, Carolyn, Dickson, Jennifer L, Tisi, Sophie, Hall, Helen, Verghese, Priyam, Prendecki, Ruth, Bhamani, Amyn, McCabe, John, Gyertson, Kylie, Mullin, Anne-Marie, Teague, Jonathan, Farrelly, Laura, Hackshaw, Allan, Nair, Arjun, Devaraj, Anand, Janes, Sam M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England 01.02.2023
• Subjects: Early Detection of Cancer; Humans; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Lung Neoplasms - pathology; Patient Care Team; Referral and Consultation; Solitary Pulmonary Nodule - pathology; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods; lung cancer; imaging/CT MRI etc
• ISSN: 0040-6376; 1468-3296
• DOI: 10.1136/thorax-2022-219403

The optimal management of small but growing nodules remains unclear. The SUMMIT study nodule management algorithm uses a specific threshold volume of 200 mm before referral of growing solid nodules to the multidisciplinary team for further investigation is advised, with growing nodules below this threshold kept under observation within the screening programme. Malignancy risk of growing solid nodules of size >200 mm at initial 3-month interval scan was 58.3% at a per-nodule level, compared with 13.3% in growing nodules of size ≤200 mm (relative risk 4.4, 95% CI 2.17 to 8.83). The positive predictive value of a combination of nodule growth (defined as percentage volume change of ≥25%), and size >200 mm was 65.9% (29/44) at a cancer-per-nodule basis, or 60.5% (23/38) on a cancer-per-participant basis. False negative rate of the protocol was 1.9% (95% CI 0.33% to 9.94%). These findings support the use of a 200 mm minimum volume threshold for referral as effective at reducing unnecessary multidisciplinary team referrals for small growing nodules, while maintaining early-stage lung cancer diagnosis.