LONG TERM OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH LEFT MAIN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE TREATED WITH EITHER PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION OR BYPASS SURGERY-EVIDENCE FROM A META-ANALYSIS

Background Long term benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for left main disease compared to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remain controversial.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 67; no. 13; p. 105
Main Authors Sardar, Partha, Chatterjee, Saurav, Kundu, Amartya, Nairooz, Ramez, Tuwairqi, Khaled, Bashir, Riyaz, O’Neill, Brian, O’Murchu, Brian, Mukherjee, Debabrata, Giri, Jay, Cohen, Howard, Owan, Theophilus
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Elsevier Inc 05.04.2016
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Cardiology
Cardiovascular
Cardiovascular disease
Clinical outcomes
Clinical trials
Confidence intervals
Coronary vessels
Heart attacks
Internal Medicine
Mortality
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background Long term benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for left main disease compared to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) remain controversial.
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/S0735-1097(16)30106-1