An evaluation of the notifiable disease surveillance system in Chegutu district, Zimbabwe, 2020: a cross-sectional study

Introductionin 2018-2019 Chegutu District had one notification form Tally 1 (T1) that was completed instead of seven for detected notifiable diseases. Different figures of cholera were reported through weekly rapid disease notification system with 106 patients and Notifiable Diseases Surveillance Sy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe Pan African medical journal Vol. 41; p. 215
Main Authors Chimsimbe, Memory, Mucheto, Pride, Govha, Emmanuel, Chadambuka, Addmore, Karakadzai, Mujinga, Juru, Tsitsi Patience, Gombe, Notion Tafara, Tshimanga, Mufuta
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published The African Field Epidemiology Network 01.01.2022
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introductionin 2018-2019 Chegutu District had one notification form Tally 1 (T1) that was completed instead of seven for detected notifiable diseases. Different figures of cholera were reported through weekly rapid disease notification system with 106 patients and Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NDSS) with 111 patients, causing data discrepancy. We evaluated the NDSS to determine reasons for underperformance and data discrepancy. Methodswe conducted descriptive cross-sectional study using updated centres for disease control and prevention guidelines for surveillance system evaluation. We recruited forty-six health workers. Interviewer-administered questionnaires and checklists were used to collect data on reasons for underperformance, reasons for data discrepancy, knowledge of NDSS, surveillance system attributes and usefulness. Epi InfoTM7 generated frequencies, proportions, and means. Likert scale was used to assess health worker knowledge. Resultsof the forty-six health workers, 34 (78%) had fair knowledge of NDSS. The reason for system underperformance was lack of training in NDSS 42 (91%). Data discrepancy was attributed to typographical mistakes made during data entry on WhatsApp platform 32 (70%). Eighty per cent (37) were willing to complete T1 forms. Six participants who were timed took ten minutes to complete T1 forms. Among 17 health facilities, only three had fifteen T1 forms that were adequate to notify first five cases in an outbreak. Notifiable diseases surveillance system data was used for planning health education 28 (68%). Conclusionthe NDSS was unstable due to health workers' inadequate knowledge and unavailability of T1 forms. Notifiable diseases surveillance system was found to be simple, acceptable, and useful. We recommended NDSS training of health workers.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:1937-8688
1937-8688
DOI:10.11604/pamj.2022.41.215.33712