Multi-reader multiparametric DECT study evaluating different strengths of iterative and deep learning-based image reconstruction techniques

• Published in: European radiology
• Main Authors: Cao, Jinjin, Mroueh, Nayla, Lennartz, Simon, Mercaldo, Nathaniel D, Pisuchpen, Nisanard, Kongboonvijit, Sasiprang, Srinivas Rao, Shravya, Yuenyongsinchai, Kampon, Pierce, Theodore T, Sertic, Madeleine, Chung, Ryan, Kambadakone, Avinash R
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Germany 24.07.2024
• Subjects: Deep learning; Dual-energy CT; Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction; Computed tomography; Abdomen
• ISSN: 1432-1084; 1432-1084
• DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10974-3

To perform a multi-reader comparison of multiparametric dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) images reconstructed with deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and standard-of-care adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V). This retrospective study included 100 patients undergoing portal venous phase abdominal CT on a rapid kVp switching DECT scanner. Six reconstructed DECT sets (ASIR-V and DLIR, each at three strengths) were generated. Each DECT set included 65 keV monoenergetic, iodine, and virtual unenhanced (VUE) images. Using a Likert scale, three radiologists performed qualitative assessments for image noise, contrast, small structure visibility, sharpness, artifact, and image preference. Quantitative assessment was performed by measuring attenuation, image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR). For the qualitative analysis, Gwet's AC2 estimates were used to assess agreement. DECT images reconstructed with DLIR yielded better qualitative scores than ASIR-V images except for artifacts, where both groups were comparable. DLIR-H images were rated higher than other reconstructions on all parameters (p-value < 0.05). On quantitative analysis, there was no significant difference in the attenuation values between ASIR-V and DLIR groups. DLIR images had higher CNR values for the liver and portal vein, and lower image noise, compared to ASIR-V images (p-value < 0.05). The subgroup analysis of patients with large body habitus (weight ≥ 90 kg) showed similar results to the study population. Inter-reader agreement was good-to-very good overall. Multiparametric post-processed DECT datasets reconstructed with DLIR were preferred over ASIR-V images with DLIR-H yielding the highest image quality scores. Deep-learning image reconstruction in dual-energy CT demonstrated significant benefits in qualitative and quantitative image metrics compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V. Dual-energy CT (DECT) images reconstructed using deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) showed superior qualitative scores compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) reconstructed images, except for artifacts where both reconstructions were rated comparable. While there was no significant difference in attenuation values between ASIR-V and DLIR groups, DLIR images showed higher contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for liver and portal vein, and lower image noise (p value < 0.05). Subgroup analysis of patients with large body habitus (weight ≥ 90 kg) yielded similar findings to the overall study population.