Transient characteristics and frequency characteristics in human tracking behavior

The main purpose of the paper is to investigate whether human control characteristics are invaiable, even though wave forms as target vary. Step waves or sinusoidal waves (0.51-4.47cps) were tracked by 6 subjects with an effort to nullify the error. Amounts of training in step waves and sinusoidal w...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNingen kogaku. The Japanese journal of ergonomics Vol. 3; no. 4; pp. 327 - 334,I
Main Author Masuyama, E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan Ergonomics Society 1967
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0549-4974
1884-2844
DOI10.5100/jje.3.327

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The main purpose of the paper is to investigate whether human control characteristics are invaiable, even though wave forms as target vary. Step waves or sinusoidal waves (0.51-4.47cps) were tracked by 6 subjects with an effort to nullify the error. Amounts of training in step waves and sinusoidal waves as targets are matched according to experimental design. Average response curves are computed from both of step response and sinusoidal responses in accordance with K. Izawa's method (1964), and vece versa. Consequently, in both of transient characteristics and frequency characteristics, the sinusoidal response is quicker than the step response. Human control characteristics are relatively invariable, even though wave forms vary. In transient characteristics, the step response transformed from sinusoidal response is quicker than the original step response, but the former is not so stable as the latter. In frequency characteristics, however, the transformed sinusoidal response is more monotonic than the original sinusoidal response.
ISSN:0549-4974
1884-2844
DOI:10.5100/jje.3.327