What are doctors’ strategies to improve care coordination? Results in six Latin-American countries

• Published in: European journal of public health Vol. 33; no. Supplement_2
• Main Authors: Oliver-Anglès, A, Vargas, I, López-Vázquez, J, Samico, I, Campaz-Landazábal, D, Mogollón-Pérez, A S, Eguiguren, P, Amarilla, D I, Bertolotto, F, Vázquez, M L
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Oxford University Press 24.10.2023
• Subjects: Poster Displays
• ISSN: 1101-1262; 1464-360X
• DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad160.1394

Abstract Background Given the problems generated by health care fragmentation, the coordinated provision of health care has become a priority, particularly in Latin America. This communication analyses the strategies for improving clinical coordination proposed by primary and secondary care doctors from public health service networks in six countries of the region (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay), and their changes between 2015 and 2017. Methods Two cross-sectional survey-based studies (2015 and 2017) were analysed with application of the COORDENA questionnaire to a total of 4311 primary and secondary care doctors from two public health service networks in each country. A descriptive analysis was carried out, stratified by country and year, of the suggestions proposed in the open question ‘What do you propose to improve clinical coordination between primary and secondary care doctors in the network? Results In all countries, the introduction or improvement of strategies and mechanisms that facilitate interaction and mutual knowledge between professionals at different care levels were highlighted, especially joint meetings, direct communication mechanisms (such as telephone and/or e-mail) and strategies to strengthen the use of the referral and counter-referral sheet. Less frequently, other organisational strategies aimed at strengthening the primary care model, improving access to secondary care and coordinating the management level of the network, were also suggested. Conclusions The results contribute to generate recommendations for the improvement of clinical coordination in health systems, based on the suggestions of doctors, a perspective that is not usually considered in the design and implementation of interventions in health services. The need to promote strategies based on mutual feedback in the design of public health policies stands out. Key messages • The design of effective interventions aimed at improving coordination requires doctors’ participation. • Strategies based on mutual feedback and communication should be promoted by healthcare organisations to improve clinical coordination.