Conspiracy Beliefs and the Perception of Intergroup Inequalities

Conspiracy beliefs are prevalent among members of disadvantaged groups. Adopting a social identity perspective, we hypothesized that these beliefs would reduce the endorsement of internal attributions for inequalities that could negatively affect the image of disadvantaged ingroups. In Study 1 ( = 1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPersonality & social psychology bulletin p. 1461672241279085
Main Authors Nera, Kenzo, Douglas, Karen M, Bertin, Paul, Delouvée, Sylvain, Klein, Olivier
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States 25.09.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Conspiracy beliefs are prevalent among members of disadvantaged groups. Adopting a social identity perspective, we hypothesized that these beliefs would reduce the endorsement of internal attributions for inequalities that could negatively affect the image of disadvantaged ingroups. In Study 1 ( = 1,104), conspiracy mentality was negatively associated with meritocracy beliefs, which attribute success and failure to internal factors. In Studies 2 to 5 ( s = 179, 251, 221, 248), taking the perspective of a person exhibiting a high (vs. low) conspiracy mentality in a fictitious context reduced participants' meritocracy beliefs, internal attributions for a privileged outgroup's situation, and fostered negative attitudes toward the outgroup. However, it did not reduce internal attributions for the situation of a disadvantaged ingroup, nor did it improve attitudes toward the ingroup. Regarding intergroup comparison, conspiracy mentality seems to primarily deteriorate the perception of privileged outgroups rather than improve the perception of disadvantaged ingroups.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0146-1672
1552-7433
1552-7433
DOI:10.1177/01461672241279085