genetics of blackleg [Leptosphaeria maculans (Desm.) Ces. et De Not.] resistance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). I. Adult-plant resistance in F2 and first-backcross populations

• Published in: Theoretical and applied genetics Vol. 93; no. 5/6; pp. 932 - 940
• Main Authors: Pang, E.C.K, Halloran, G.M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Germany 01.10.1996
• Subjects: backcrossing; Brassica napus; crossing; crown; crown canker; disease resistance; external lesion length; fungal diseases of plants; genetic resistance; genetic variance; heritability; inheritance (genetics); internal lesion area; Leptosphaeria maculans; lesions; major genes; pathogenesis; percentage of crown girdled; polygenic inheritance; quantitative genetics; segregation; symptoms
• ISSN: 0040-5752; 1432-2242
• DOI: 10.1007/BF00224096

The genetic control of adult-plant blackleg [Leptosphaeria maculans (Desm.) Ces. et De Not.] resistance in rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) was studied in the F2 and first-backcross populations of the cross "Maluka" (blackleg-resistant) X "Niklas" (highly susceptible). A L. maculans isolate possessing high levels of host specificity (MB2) was used in all inoculations. Resistance/susceptibility was evaluated using three separate measures of crown-canker size, i.e. the percentage of crown girdled (%G), external lesion length (E) and internal lesion area (%II). Disease severity scores for the F2 and first-backcross populations based on E and %II gave discontinuous distributions, indicating major-gene control for these measures of resistance; but those for %G were continuous, indicating quantitative genetic control for this measure. Chi-square tests performed on the (poorly-defined) resistance classes, based on E, in the F2 and first-backcross populations indicated the likelihood for resistance being governed by a single, incompletely dominant major gene. Although the distributions of the F2 and first-backcross populations, based on %II, were clearly discontinuous, the observed segregation ratios for resistance and susceptibility did not fit any of the numerous Mendelian ratios which were considered. Differences in inheritance of resistance according to the assessment method and blackleg isolate used, were discussed.