The impact of arable soil management on physical functions – The ratio of air capacity and air permeability or hydraulic conductivity as a document of harmful soil compaction

• Published in: Soil & tillage research Vol. 244; p. 106221
• Main Authors: Horn, R., Mordhorst, A., Fleige, H.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.12.2024
• Subjects: Compaction verification tool; Harmful compaction; Soil structure; Soil types; Compaction verification tool; Soil structure; Soil types; Harmful compaction
• ISSN: 0167-1987
• DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2024.106221

Soil health or soil degradation criteria are until now not well documented for a greater number of soil profiles under conventional and conservation tillage management in the literature. In order to evaluate the compaction status of more than 700 arable sites analyzed within the last 40 years, the Compaction Verification Tool (CVT) was applied according to Zink et al. (2011). Besides the ratio of air capacity (AC, at a matric potential of −6 kPa) and saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks), the ratio of AC and air conductivity (Ka, at a matric potential of −6 kPa) was considered for evaluating the compaction status with respect to potentially harmful soil alterations. The compaction status was classified into the CVT classes I–IV, where a harmful subsoil compaction was assumed, if both values of AC and Ks or AC and Ka simultaneously exceeded (are smaller than) their defined critical value indicating limited conditions for plant growth (CVT class IV). We analyzed the compaction status of soil profiles with respect to clay content, soil type, structural stage (aggregate forms) and time span of sampling (1980–1999, 2000–2020) under conventional and conservation tillage for top- and subsoil horizons. While also some of the annually plowed topsoils under conventional tillage showed critical values of AC, Ks and Ka, the occurrence of harmful soil compaction is most dominant in the subsoil horizons (> 30 cm depth) because of a higher proportion of class IV which increased with the clay content (from < 12 % to > 12 % clay), irrespective of the applied ratio used for verification (AC/Ks or AC/Ka). Especially the highly productive Luvisols showed a high percentage of harmful compaction in the subsoil (30–41 % in CVT class IV). Soil profiles under conservation tillage management are less affected by harmful compaction. The more aggregated subsoils showed smaller proportions of class IV, which was further influenced by the clay content. •The soil threat by harmful soil compaction (CVT IV) can be explained on the ratio of AC:Ks and AC:Ka.•Luvisols show severe subsoil compaction, documented by a higher number of Class IV subsoil sites.•Soils with clay contents > 12 % are often more intensely deformed than sandier sites.•The ratios between AC and Ks and AC and Ka show similar results.•Soils under conservation tillage are less degraded than under conventional tillage.